123 Main Street, New York, NY 10001

Polarization Imaging: DoLP/AoLP Reconstruction & Calibration

← Back to: Imaging / Camera / Machine Vision

Polarization imaging adds two measurable signals—DoLP and AoLP—on top of intensity, enabling controllable glare suppression and stronger defect/orientation contrast that standard cameras often miss. Reliable results depend on a tight evidence chain: correct demosaicing, polarization-domain ISP hooks, per-pixel calibration, and microsecond-class synchronization with stable optics/illumination baselines.

H2-1. Definition & Why Polarization Helps (DoLP/AoLP in one page)

Goal: define what polarization imaging measures beyond intensity, and how that extra information converts into controllable contrast for industrial inspection (glare, transparent covers, stress patterns, surface defects).

Allowed focus: S0 / Intensity DoLP AoLP specular vs diffuse glare suppression polar evidence trigger alignment

What polarization imaging adds (measurable, not “more clear”)

  • S0 (Intensity): the conventional brightness image—still required for geometry, segmentation, and basic defect localization.
  • DoLP (Degree of Linear Polarization): a scalar “how polarized” indicator. It often rises in specular/high-glare regions and changes with surface finish, enabling robust masking or contrast re-weighting.
  • AoLP (Angle of Linear Polarization): a direction field (orientation). It can highlight stress-induced patterns, fiber/composite direction, or anisotropic surface features when intensity contrast is weak or unstable.

Polarization vs reflection (only the engineering consequence)

  • Specular reflections tend to show stronger polarization structure than purely diffuse regions, so DoLP/AoLP can separate “glare energy” from “texture/defect energy.”
  • Transparent covers and glossy coatings often break intensity-based inspection (overexposure, bloom, hotspot). DoLP-driven masking can recover edges and defects that vanish in S0.
  • Stress patterns and directional materials may be difficult in S0 because contrast depends on lighting angle. AoLP can provide a more repeatable directional signature.

When polarization is worth the cost (decision checklist)

  • Glare dominates failure rate: S0 saturates or loses defect visibility; DoLP allows a glare mask or glare-suppressed fusion output.
  • Transparent or glossy surfaces: cover glass, films, coatings, or wet surfaces where intensity varies wildly by viewpoint.
  • Stress / birefringence patterns: plastic parts, tempered glass stress, adhesives; AoLP/DoLP can stabilize pattern visibility across exposure changes.
  • Directional textures: fiber layup, brushed metals, composites—AoLP offers an orientation field for inspection rules.
What to measure first (2 steps):
  • Step A: Capture the same scene and generate S0 vs DoLP side-by-side.
  • Step B: Inspect the specular/glare ROI: if S0 loses structure but DoLP retains boundaries or separability, polarization has immediate engineering value.

Practical interpretation: polarization is valuable when it creates a controllable separation signal (mask/weighting) rather than merely “a different look.”

Polarization Imaging: What Gets Measured S0 (Intensity) + DoLP (polarization degree) + AoLP (polarization angle) Scene glare / scratch / stress Glare Scratch Stress Lens optics path Polarized Pixel Sensor micro-polarizer mosaic 0/45/90/135 Polar Demosaic reorder + interpolate compute Stokes Outputs (measurable signals) S0 Intensity DoLP polar degree AoLP polar angle orientation Where polarization helps Glare suppression Stress patterns Surface defects Evidence: S0 vs DoLP
Figure F1. Polarization imaging measures conventional intensity (S0) plus polarization features (DoLP/AoLP), enabling robust separation signals (e.g., glare masking) when intensity alone saturates or becomes unstable.
Cite this figure — Figure F1: Polarization Imaging signal chain (S0/DoLP/AoLP outputs).

H2-2. Polarized Pixel Architecture (micro-polarizer array & super-pixel)

Goal: explain the 2×2 polarization super-pixel and why its non-idealities (angle offset, leakage/extinction, crosstalk, offset/gain mismatch) directly translate into DoLP/AoLP errors and artifacts.

Core concept: a 2×2 super-pixel is the measurement unit

  • Many polarization sensors use a micro-polarizer mosaic where a 2×2 block measures four analyzer angles: 0° / 45° / 90° / 135°.
  • The sensor does not deliver DoLP/AoLP “for free.” It delivers four angle-sampled intensities that must be reordered, interpolated, and converted into polarization features.
  • Engineering implication: polarization accuracy is dominated by relative consistency between the four angle channels, not only by absolute image quality.

Minimal math (only what is needed to reason about errors)

Let the four analyzer samples from a super-pixel be I0, I45, I90, I135. A common, engineering-useful approximation is:

  • S0 ≈ I0 + I90 (total intensity proxy)
  • S1 ≈ I0 − I90 (horizontal vs vertical polarization balance)
  • S2 ≈ I45 − I135 (diagonal polarization balance)
  • DoLP = √(S1² + S2²) / S0
  • AoLP = 0.5 · atan2(S2, S1) (direction field; wrap handling belongs to later chapters)

Why this matters: every non-ideality in the four channels perturbs S1/S2/S0 differently, which shows up as DoLP bias (too high/too low) and AoLP shifts/jumps.

Four dominant non-idealities (error → symptom → fastest discriminator)

  • Angle offset (micro-polarizer orientation error)
    Symptom: AoLP is globally rotated or varies spatially (patchy AoLP bias).
    Discriminator: rotating a linear polarizer produces curves with a consistent phase shift (global) or region-dependent phase shifts (spatial).
  • Finite extinction / leakage
    Symptom: DoLP ceiling is limited; high-DoLP scenes appear “washed” in polarization contrast.
    Discriminator: under a known strong linear polarization input, measured DoLP fails to approach expected upper bounds even after gain matching.
  • Crosstalk (optical/electrical mixing between channels)
    Symptom: DoLP/AoLP textures appear where S0 looks normal, especially near fine repetitive patterns or sharp edges.
    Discriminator: polarization artifacts correlate with spatial frequency/edge orientation and change with focus/MTF or pattern pitch.
  • Offset/gain mismatch (black-level / channel gain inconsistency)
    Symptom: dark regions show unstable DoLP, and AoLP becomes noisy or random at low signal levels.
    Discriminator: in a dark/covered condition, non-zero S1/S2 structure persists (indicates offset imbalance before any “real polarization” exists).
First two measurements (fastest triage):
  • Measure #1: Under a uniform source + rotating linear polarizer, log I0/I45/I90/I135 vs angle and verify phase spacing and amplitude match.
  • Measure #2: Under dark/covered input, check whether S1/S2 contain spatial structure (offset mismatch) that would falsely inflate DoLP or randomize AoLP.
Polarized Pixel Super-Pixel (2×2) and Channel Non-Idealities Validate with a rotating linear polarizer: phase alignment + amplitude match A) 2×2 super-pixel 0° / 45° / 90° / 135° analyzers 45° 90° 135° Non-idealities angle offset finite extinction (leakage) crosstalk offset/gain mismatch B) Ideal response (rotating polarizer) 180° I Checks: phase spacing amplitude C) Typical mismatch signatures 180° Interpretation phase shift → angle offset low amp → leakage / gain baseline → black-level pattern-linked → crosstalk
Figure F2. The 2×2 polarization super-pixel delivers four analyzer samples that must remain phase-aligned and gain-matched. Rotating-polarizer tests quickly reveal angle offsets, leakage, crosstalk, and black-level/gain mismatch that bias DoLP/AoLP.
Cite this figure — Figure F2: 2×2 super-pixel mosaic and mismatch signatures.

Next chapters (not included in this batch) will use these foundations to explain polarization demosaicing, polarization-specific artifacts (de-moiré / angle wrap), calibration maps, and synchronization evidence.

H2-3. Polarization Demosaicing (from mosaic to per-pixel Stokes)

Goal: convert the polarized-pixel mosaic into stable per-pixel polarization features (S0/S1/S2, DoLP/AoLP), while preventing edge artifacts, beat-pattern moiré, and low-signal angle instability.

Core ownership: mosaic → channels reorder / align edge-aware interpolate Stokes DoLP / AoLP artifact hooks

Two reconstruction modes (choose by risk & resolution)

  • Super-pixel output (lower resolution, higher robustness): compute one polarization solution per 2×2 super-pixel (minimal interpolation). Best when the priority is stable inspection signals and predictable AoLP continuity.
  • Full-resolution output (higher detail, higher artifact risk): reorder into four angle-channels, then interpolate (prefer edge-aware) before Stokes. Best when small defect localization matters—but must be paired with artifact checks.

Reference pipeline (safe ordering)

  • 1) Mosaic capture: raw polarized pixel mosaic is the measurement; DoLP/AoLP does not exist yet.
  • 2) Channel split + reorder: form the four sub-images I0, I45, I90, I135 from the mosaic grid.
  • 3) Channel alignment (registration): compensate the intrinsic sub-pixel sampling offsets between channels to avoid “texture → polarization” leakage.
  • 4) Interpolation (edge-aware): fill missing samples per channel while preserving edges; this step is where most AoLP failures are created or avoided.
  • 5) Stokes compute: derive S0, S1, S2 (using the chapter-2 definitions) from the aligned channels.
  • 6) DoLP/AoLP: compute polarization degree and angle; apply AoLP representation rules (wrap/unwrap hooks are validated in H2-4).

Failure modes that matter (symptom → mechanism → fastest discriminator)

  • Edge AoLP jumps
    Mechanism: edge interpolation biases one channel, perturbing the S1/S2 ratio and flipping AoLP near boundaries.
    Discriminator: on a slanted-edge target, AoLP should remain locally continuous after unwrap; repeated “tile flips” indicates interpolation/registration issues.
  • Beat-pattern false texture (near pixel-period frequency)
    Mechanism: scene spatial frequency interacts with the polarization sampling lattice; differencing produces polarization-only stripes.
    Discriminator: DoLP shows regular stripes that are absent (or much weaker) in S0 for the same ROI.
  • Low-S0 angle instability
    Mechanism: when S0 is small, DoLP/AoLP become highly sensitive to noise and offsets; AoLP becomes speckled or random.
    Discriminator: masking low-S0 or low-DoLP regions stabilizes AoLP immediately (proves numerical instability, not “real polarization”).
Evidence chain (what to test first):
  • Pattern A: slanted edge + checker/stripe → verify AoLP continuity at edges and absence of polarization-only striping.
  • Pattern B: rotate a linear polarizer → confirm that AoLP changes smoothly (after unwrap) and that per-angle channels follow consistent phase spacing.

Practical pass condition: edge stability + phase consistency before optimizing visual sharpness.

Polarization Demosaicing: Mosaic → Stokes → DoLP / AoLP Keep channels aligned; protect edges; validate AoLP continuity (unwrap-aware) Mosaic raw polar pixels 0/45/90/135 Reorder I0 I45 I90 I135 I0 I45 I90 I135 Align register channels Interpolate edge-aware fill Stokes S0 / S1 / S2 Polar Features DoLP + AoLP (wrap-aware) Output options Super-pixel robust lower res Full-res edge-aware artifact risk Artifact injection points Edge artifact Beat / alias Angle wrap + low-S0 instability
Figure F3. A safe polarization demosaicing pipeline separates and aligns the four analyzer channels before edge-aware interpolation and Stokes computation. Explicit hooks for edge artifacts, beat-pattern aliasing, and AoLP wrap handling prevent the most common field failures.
Cite this figure — Figure F3: Polarization demosaicing pipeline with artifact injection points.

H2-4. Polarization-Specific Artifacts (moiré, angle wrap, crosstalk)

Goal: explain why polarization outputs show stripes or angle discontinuities that do not exist in intensity, and provide fast evidence-based isolation: moiré/beat, AoLP wrap, or cross-channel mixing.

Artifact types: de-moiré (beat) AoLP wrap crosstalk DoLP-only stripes edge-linked failure

Fast isolation rule (2-image test)

  • Generate S0 (Intensity) and DoLP for the same ROI.
  • If DoLP shows regular stripes or grid patterns that are absent in S0, suspect a polarization-specific artifact chain (demosaic / alias / crosstalk) before blaming the part.

Artifact A — de-moiré / beat-pattern stripes

  • What it looks like: periodic stripes in DoLP/AoLP (often aligned to the sensor lattice or a scene grating) while S0 looks relatively normal.
  • Root cause: the polarization sampling lattice interacts with scene texture frequency; channel differencing amplifies the beat frequency.
  • Fast discriminator: change distance/focus slightly or rotate the textured target—if stripe frequency/phase shifts sharply, it is lattice/texture beating.
  • First fix: prefer super-pixel output for robustness, or apply light edge-preserving smoothing in the polarization domain (DoLP/AoLP) after validating registration.

Artifact B — AoLP wrap (angle discontinuity)

  • What it looks like: abrupt AoLP “jumps” (e.g., +89° to −89°) forming hard seams or color breaks.
  • Root cause: AoLP is an angle; the chosen representation range (±90° or 0–180°) creates an inherent discontinuity.
  • Fast discriminator: apply unwrap (or convert to a continuous representation) and re-check continuity. If the seam disappears, it was representation—not interpolation.
  • First fix: define a single AoLP convention for the system and mask low-DoLP/low-S0 regions where AoLP is physically meaningless and numerically unstable.

Artifact C — crosstalk (channel mixing → DoLP bias)

  • What it looks like: DoLP appears too high/too low in highlights or dark regions; polarization “texture” changes with edge direction or pattern orientation.
  • Root cause: optical/electrical mixing between analyzer channels distorts S1/S2; leakage/extinction and offset/gain mismatch can compound the effect.
  • Fast discriminator: compare a bright specular ROI and a dark ROI across exposure/gain steps—abnormal DoLP behavior suggests mixing + channel mismatch.
  • First fix: restore four-channel offset/gain consistency (Chapter 2 checks) before deeper model calibration.
What to measure first (triage):
  • #1: S0 vs DoLP for the same ROI (locks “polar-only” artifacts).
  • #2: AoLP after unwrap + a low-DoLP mask (separates representation seams from true reconstruction errors).
Polarization-Specific Artifacts: Identify Before You “Fix” Use S0 vs DoLP and AoLP unwrap to isolate: moiré / wrap / crosstalk A) de-moiré (beat pattern) texture frequency × pixel lattice → DoLP-only stripes DoLP output striping appears B) AoLP wrap + Crosstalk angle representation seams and channel mixing AoLP wrap seam 0° / 180° ±90° Fix: unwrap + low-DoLP mask Crosstalk I0 ↔ I90 ↔ I45 ↔ I135 mix Fast rule: DoLP-only stripes → artifact chain Check: S0 vs DoLP + AoLP unwrap
Figure F4. Polarization artifacts often reveal themselves as patterns that are strong in DoLP/AoLP but weak in S0. Beat-pattern moiré comes from lattice–texture interaction, AoLP wrap is a representation seam, and crosstalk biases S1/S2 causing DoLP/AoLP instability (especially in highlights and dark regions).
Cite this figure — Figure F4: de-moiré, AoLP wrap, and crosstalk mechanisms.

H2-5. ISP Hooks for Polarization (de-moiré, contrast, glare suppression)

Goal: use polarization-only signals (DoLP/AoLP/Stokes) as ISP hooks for controllable gains: suppress polar moiré, reduce specular glare, and enhance polarization contrast without over-smoothing intensity.

Hook signals: S0 (Intensity) Stokes DoLP mask AoLP stabilizer fusion output

Hook 1 — Polar de-moiré (polar-domain vs intensity-domain)

  • Why polar-domain helps: beat-pattern striping often appears strongly in DoLP/AoLP while being weak in S0. Filtering in the polarization domain can suppress “polar-only” artifacts without flattening real intensity detail.
  • When intensity-domain is unavoidable: if the same periodic pattern is already strong in S0, intensity-domain pre-cleaning may be required before polarization features become stable.
  • Fast split rule: if DoLP shows regular stripes that are absent (or much weaker) in S0, prioritize polar-domain de-moiré first.

Hook 2 — Glare suppression (DoLP-guided mask / reweight)

  • Core idea: specular glare can be separated as a controllable component by using a DoLP-guided mask (with safety gates). A common pattern is mask = (DoLP high) AND (S0 high) AND (not saturated).
  • What the mask enables: reweight glare regions (reduce intensity contribution) or fuse with neighborhood/alternate exposures while preserving non-glare texture.
  • Common failure to avoid: saturation breaks the channel relations and can invalidate DoLP; always include a “not saturated” gate.

Hook 3 — Polar contrast & AoLP stability

  • DoLP contrast: local contrast on DoLP can reveal features that are weak in S0 (coatings, micro-scratches, stress marks), but should be limited to avoid amplifying noise in low-S0 areas.
  • AoLP stabilizer: AoLP is an angle field; apply edge-preserving stabilization with wrap-aware handling and suppress AoLP output where DoLP/S0 indicates low confidence.
Evidence chain (3 images that prove controllable gain):
  • Image 1: S0 (Intensity)
  • Image 2: DoLP mask (or DoLP heatmap + thresholded mask)
  • Image 3: Glare-reduced intensity (fusion output)

Pass condition: glare region is reduced while non-glare texture remains crisp; the DoLP mask overlaps the glare area without over-covering.

ISP Hooks for Polarization Intensity path + Polar path → DoLP mask/weights → Fusion output Input S0 + mosaic channels Intensity path S0 processing S0 detail glare gate Polar path DoLP / AoLP hooks de-moiré DoLP mask AoLP stabilizer (wrap-aware) Mask / Weights DoLP + S0 gates mask glare ROI Fusion output glare-reduced S0 Evidence (3 outputs) S0 Intensity DoLP mask Output glare-reduced
Figure F5. Polarization ISP hooks split the pipeline into an intensity path and a polarization path. DoLP/AoLP provide a stable mask/weight map to suppress glare and polar-only moiré while preserving S0 detail.
Cite this figure — Figure F5: Intensity path & Polar path fused by a DoLP mask.

H2-6. Calibration for Polarization (angle map, extinction, flat-field)

Goal: make polarization features quantifiable and repeatable by calibrating per-pixel angle response, channel gain/offset consistency, extinction/leakage behavior, and flat-field uniformity.

Calibration deliverables: angle map gain / offset maps extinction / leakage flat-field residual metrics temp LUT

What must be calibrated (and what breaks if it is not)

  • Per-pixel angle offset: prevents spatial AoLP “patchiness” on uniform scenes.
  • Channel gain/offset: controls DoLP bias in dark regions and stabilizes thresholds for masking/fusion.
  • Extinction / leakage indicator: prevents highlight DoLP distortion when analyzer channels are not ideal.
  • Flat-field: removes fixed-pattern structure that otherwise looks like false polarization texture.

Practical calibration method (rotating polarizer + uniform light)

  • Jig: uniform illumination (integrating sphere / uniform panel) + rotating linear polarizer + rigid camera mount.
  • Capture: a sweep of polarizer angles (multiple steps) plus dark frames and flat frames.
  • Fit objective: per-pixel response vs angle should be phase-consistent with expected spacing across I0/I45/I90/I135; residuals should be low and spatially unstructured.

Outputs (maps) that enable engineering acceptance

  • Angle map: per-pixel angle offset (or equivalent parameterization) used to stabilize AoLP and DoLP estimation.
  • Gain/offset maps: per-channel normalization maps to remove relative channel mismatch.
  • Extinction/leakage indicator: a per-pixel (or per-region) quality parameter used for mask confidence and bias control.
  • Flat-field map: S0 and/or channel flat-field to eliminate fixed spatial structure.
  • Quality mask (optional): flags pixels/regions with high residuals for downstream avoidance.
Acceptance criteria (engineering-verifiable):
  • Angle error: report RMS and 95th-percentile errors; reject if the distribution shows strong spatial clustering.
  • DoLP error: under known polarization input, DoLP bias and non-uniformity must remain within a controlled band.
  • Residual distribution: residuals should not form a repeating spatial texture (a sign of uncorrected systematics).
  • Repeatability: repeating the sweep (or changing exposure/gain within limits) should not materially change the maps.

Temperature drift (keep it practical)

  • Why it matters: angle offset and DoLP thresholds can shift with temperature, causing masks and fusion outputs to drift.
  • Minimum mitigation: calibrate at multiple temperature points and store a small LUT (or fitted coefficients) used at runtime.
  • Boundary note: parameter storage governance and versioning belong to the “Calibration & NVM” page.
Polarization Calibration: Make DoLP / AoLP Quantifiable Rotating polarizer + uniform light → angle / gain maps + residual metrics Calibration jig Uniform light integrating / panel Rotating polarizer angle sweep Camera fixed mount sensor Temp LUT Outputs (maps) Angle map Gain / offset Extinction / leakage Flat-field Residual metrics RMS + P95 no texture
Figure F6. A practical polarization calibration jig uses uniform illumination and a rotating linear polarizer to fit per-pixel polarization response. The deliverables are angle and gain/offset maps, extinction/leakage indicators, flat-field correction, and residual metrics that enable acceptance and repeatability checks.
Cite this figure — Figure F6: Calibration jig and output maps for polarization imaging.

H2-7. Synchronization & Multi-Frame Consistency (trigger/FSYNC, timestamp alignment)

Goal: polarization outputs (DoLP/AoLP) stay stable only when trigger, exposure, strobe, and frame timestamps are aligned within a controlled skew/jitter window. This chapter focuses on practical alignment strategy (no PTP algorithm deep dive).

Sync hooks: Trigger / FSYNC Exposure active Strobe window Timestamp align Fixed delay deskew Frame-to-frame stats

Three synchronization scenarios (and why polarization is sensitive)

  • Strobe ↔ exposure alignment (µs-class): strobe drift or overlap error changes highlight energy and can create false DoLP/AoLP changes frame-to-frame.
  • Multi-camera polarization fusion: same trigger and aligned frame timing are required before any spatial fusion is trusted.
  • Moving targets: time misalignment shifts the sampled physical point and appears as “material polarization change” unless timing is controlled.

Practical engineering strategy (no timing-system deep dive)

  • Use one capture event: distribute a single trigger/FSYNC to define exposure start consistently.
  • Align by fixed offsets: measure and correct deterministic delay (deskew) between trigger, exposure-active, and strobe enable.
  • Gate by confidence: suppress DoLP/AoLP evaluation when exposure is saturated or signal is too low; timing errors are easiest to see on stable ROIs.
  • Define a skew/jitter window: specify acceptable timing skew and jitter bounds so verification can be repeated and signed off.
Evidence chain (minimum):
  • Waveform A: Trigger / FSYNC
  • Waveform B: Exposure active (camera strobe-out / exposure-valid pin)
  • Optional waveform: Strobe enable or strobe current window
  • Consistency metric: frame-to-frame DoLP statistics on a stable ROI (mean/variance trend)

Pass condition: strobe sits inside exposure-active with margin; measured skew/jitter stays within the defined window; DoLP/AoLP frame-to-frame variance converges on a reference ROI.

Synchronization & Multi-Frame Consistency Trigger / Exposure / Strobe / Timestamp must align within a controlled window Timing diagram Skew = deterministic offset; Jitter = variation across captures time → Trigger / FSYNC Exposure active Strobe window Frame timestamp jitter exposure strobe timestamp latch skew window margin
Figure F7. Trigger/FSYNC defines the capture event, exposure-active defines the valid integration window, and strobe must land fully inside exposure with margin. Timestamp latching must be aligned with a known reference and deskewed by fixed offsets; jitter/skew windows make verification repeatable.
Cite this figure — Figure F7: Timing alignment for polarization multi-frame consistency.

H2-8. Optics & Illumination Constraints (birefringence, lens effects, polarized lighting)

Goal: identify system-level “pollution sources” that bias AoLP/DoLP before algorithms are blamed. Lens/window stress (birefringence) and polarized illumination can shift baselines and inject spatial patterns. This chapter focuses on verification and baseline SOP (no driver/controller implementation).

System constraints: lens birefringence window stress polarized illumination baseline drift reference target

Lens & window birefringence (symptoms → fastest verification)

  • Typical symptom: AoLP shows a structured field (patches or gradients) on a uniform target; the pattern can remain even when the scene lacks polarization structure.
  • Fastest verification: capture an “empty scene” or uniform diffuse reference board. If DoLP/AoLP are non-zero or spatially patterned beyond a stable baseline, suspect optics/window stress first.
  • Rotation check: rotating the window or camera and observing pattern rotation indicates the bias originates in the optical chain.

Polarized illumination & geometry (baseline shifts that look like defects)

  • Typical symptom: DoLP baseline stays elevated (or changes with light direction) even without a polarized target.
  • Fastest verification: change illumination angle or add diffusion; if DoLP baseline shifts, illumination/geometry is dominating.
  • Engineering requirement: define a system baseline under a fixed illumination setup and treat deviations as a diagnosis signal.
Baseline SOP (simple, repeatable):
  • Step 1: capture a uniform diffuse reference board (or empty scene) under the intended light setup.
  • Step 2: compute DoLP baseline mean/variance per ROI (and across the field).
  • Step 3: repeat after small mechanical/thermal changes; baseline should remain stable within a controlled band.
  • Decision: unstable baseline → optics/illumination/assembly first; stable baseline but target issues → return to calibration/demosaic chain.
Optics & Illumination Constraints Lens/window stress + polarized light can bias AoLP/DoLP baselines Light may be polarized Target specular + diffuse diffuse specular Lens birefringence AoLP bias Window stress / mount baseline drift Sensor polar pixel matrix 0/45/90/135 Baseline check reference board / empty scene → DoLP baseline stability DoLP mean/var field uniformity repeatable
Figure F8. Polarization results can be biased by polarized illumination, target reflection geometry, lens birefringence, and window/cover-glass stress. A baseline SOP using a reference board or empty scene quickly distinguishes optical/illumination bias from algorithmic issues.
Cite this figure — Figure F8: Optical path “pollution points” and baseline verification.

H2-9. Validation Test Plan (pass/fail metrics for DoLP/AoLP)

Goal: make polarization imaging measurable and sign-off ready. This chapter defines tools, test flows, pass/fail metrics, and an executable test matrix that ties conditions to criteria and report outputs.

Validation focus: AoLP / DoLP accuracy spatial consistency temperature drift repeatability glare suppression gain defect contrast gain

Minimum lab toolkit (repeatable, low ambiguity)

  • Rotating linear polarizer: provides a controllable AoLP ground-truth sweep.
  • Uniform light source: isolates spatial artifacts and baseline bias (flat-field style checks).
  • Standard reflection targets: diffuse + specular regions for glare-benefit validation.
  • Angle stage / rotation table: locks geometry so changes are attributable to polarization, not pose drift.

Metrics (what to measure, how to interpret)

AoLP accuracy (angle-domain)

What compare AoLP output against polarizer sweep direction.

Watch angle wrap handling and edge stability (avoid false “jumps”).

Output error distribution + spatial map of residuals.

DoLP accuracy (degree-of-polarization)

What DoLP response under known polarized input and reference conditions.

Watch black-level bias and leakage/extinction limits (dark/highlight extremes).

Output DoLP mean/variance vs polarizer angle + ROI statistics.

Spatial consistency (uniform scene)

What DoLP/AoLP should be near zero-structure or stable baseline on uniform targets.

Watch repeated textures or grid-like residuals (mosaic-related imprint).

Output field uniformity map + “striping” detector summary.

Stability (temperature + repeatability)

What baseline drift curves across temperature points and across repeats.

Watch monotonic drift (optics/illumination bias) vs random variance (noise/timing).

Output drift plots + repeatability score (frame-to-frame/ run-to-run).

Scenario benefit validation (prove controllable gain)

  • Glare suppression gain: show Intensity vs DoLP mask vs glare-reduced output under the same setup.
  • Defect contrast gain: quantify contrast uplift on scratches/coatings/stress patterns using consistent geometry.
Report outputs (sign-off friendly): AoLP error distribution, DoLP response curves, spatial residual maps, temperature drift curves, repeatability summary, and benefit snapshots (before/after with masks). Pass/fail is derived from the matrix below.

Test Matrix (Conditions × Metrics × Criteria)

Test condition Metrics captured Pass/Fail criteria Typical failure signature First corrective action
Uniform board
fixed exposure, stable light
DoLP baseline mean/var
AoLP field structure
spatial residual map
PASS: stable baseline band (defined per system)
FAIL: patterned AoLP/DoLP residuals
grid-like textures, corner gradients, repeatable striping verify illumination baseline; check optics/window stress; re-run flat-field/angle maps
Polarizer sweep
angle steps across 0–180°
AoLP tracking error
DoLP vs angle curve
residual distribution
PASS: AoLP follows sweep smoothly
FAIL: jumps / phase offset / asymmetry
AoLP wrap jumps; channel mismatch; bias in dark or highlight validate wrap handling; check per-channel gains/black-level; verify leakage model
Texture target
fine patterns near pixel pitch
DoLP-only striping score
moiré frequency signature
edge stability
PASS: no DoLP-exclusive stripes
FAIL: beat-frequency bands appear
banding only in DoLP/AoLP but not in S0 enable polarization de-moiré hook; adjust interpolation/edge-aware settings
Specular + diffuse
glare stress scene
DoLP mask quality
glare-reduced output
saturation ratio
PASS: glare area reduced + detail recovered
FAIL: no improvement or over-suppression
mask leaks into diffuse areas; highlight remains saturated tune DoLP gating thresholds; clamp saturated pixels; verify sync if strobe is used
Temperature points
cold / ambient / hot
baseline drift curves
AoLP/DoLP stability
repeatability
PASS: drift within defined band
FAIL: drift grows or changes pattern
field pattern changes with temperature; baseline shifts apply temperature compensation tables; re-check optics stress and illumination stability
Repeat runs
N repeats, fixed setup
run-to-run variance
frame-to-frame stats
timestamp stability
PASS: variance converges
FAIL: random excursions
DoLP variance spikes; intermittent AoLP discontinuity check trigger/exposure alignment; reduce jitter; verify deskew offsets
Validation Overview Conditions × Metrics → Pass/Fail report Coverage matrix Checkmarks indicate required measurements per condition Condition AoLP DoLP Spatial Drift Gain Uniform Sweep Texture Specular Temp Repeat Tool → Step → Report Keep the flow minimal and repeatable Tools Polarizer • Uniform light • Targets • Stage Steps Capture sweeps Compute metrics Compare criteria Report PASS / FAIL plots residual maps + masks
Figure F9. A compact validation system ties each test condition to required metrics and produces a sign-off report. The goal is repeatability: tool setup → capture steps → criteria comparison → pass/fail with supporting plots.
Cite this figure — Figure F9: Validation matrix + tool-to-report pipeline.

H2-10. Field Debug Playbook (symptom → evidence → isolate → fix)

Goal: provide a repeatable, evidence-first troubleshooting SOP for polarization pipelines. Each symptom uses the same structure: First 2 measurements → Discriminator → First fix.

Playbook focus: S0 vs DoLP/AoLP compare trigger vs exposure waveform ROI stats stability deskew first baseline first

Playbook template (use for every symptom)

First 2 measurements
  • One waveform or timestamp check
  • One image-domain compare (S0 vs DoLP/AoLP) or ROI stats
Discriminator
  • One rule that pins the fault class
  • Prefer “if X appears only in DoLP/AoLP” tests
First fix
  • Smallest change with highest leverage
  • Re-test using the same 2 measurements

Symptom playbooks (high-frequency field issues)

Symptom: DoLP is high across the entire frame (even on “neutral” regions)

First 2 measurements
  • Capture S0 and DoLP on a uniform reference board
  • Change illumination angle or add diffusion; record DoLP baseline shift
Discriminator
  • If DoLP baseline shifts with illumination geometry, suspect polarized illumination / optical bias
  • If DoLP is high mainly in dark regions, suspect black-level bias / leakage model limits
First fix
  • Establish baseline SOP (reference board) and subtract stable baseline if required
  • Clamp or gate low-signal pixels; re-validate black-level handling in the polarization pipeline

Symptom: AoLP shows “edge jumps” or discontinuities near contrast boundaries

First 2 measurements
  • Use a slanted-edge target; inspect AoLP continuity along the edge
  • Run a short multi-frame capture; compute AoLP stability on a fixed ROI
Discriminator
  • If jumps appear only near edges, suspect interpolation / edge-aware settings
  • If jumps appear intermittently frame-to-frame, suspect timing misalignment (deskew) or wrap handling
First fix
  • Enable wrap-aware smoothing and reduce aggressive edge interpolation
  • Verify trigger ↔ exposure alignment; apply fixed-offset deskew before multi-frame logic

Symptom: stripes / moiré-like bands appear in DoLP/AoLP outputs

First 2 measurements
  • Compare S0 vs DoLP: does the banding exist only in DoLP/AoLP?
  • Capture a texture target near pixel pitch; check if the band spacing changes with zoom/scale
Discriminator
  • If bands exist only in DoLP/AoLP, lock the fault to polarization reconstruction/de-moiré path
  • If band spacing shifts with scale, it is consistent with beat-frequency (scene vs mosaic) artifacts
First fix
  • Enable polarization de-moiré in DoLP/AoLP domain; tune thresholds conservatively
  • Adjust interpolation strategy (edge-aware) to reduce mosaic imprint

Symptom: multi-camera polarization fusion is inconsistent (same target, different DoLP/AoLP)

First 2 measurements
  • Measure Trigger/FSYNC and Exposure-active on both cameras (deskew check)
  • Capture the same reference board and compare DoLP baseline statistics per camera
Discriminator
  • If deskew differs, timing mismatch is the primary suspect
  • If timing matches but baselines differ, suspect calibration-table mismatch or temperature/optics bias
First fix
  • Apply fixed-offset deskew and verify with waveforms before fusion
  • Re-run baseline checks at the same temperature and illumination geometry
Field Debug Decision Tree Symptoms → Measurements → Root cause → First fix Symptoms First measurements Root cause First fix DoLP high AoLP jump Stripes Fusion mismatch S0 vs DoLP Baseline ROI stats Edge target Texture target Trigger vs Exposure Multi-cam baseline Illumination bias Black-level bias Wrap / interpolate Mosaic imprint Deskew error Table mismatch Baseline SOP Gate low SNR Wrap-aware smooth Enable de-moiré Apply deskew Re-check baseline
Figure F10. A field-ready troubleshooting tree: start with two measurements (one compare + one stability/waveform), use a single discriminator to lock the fault class, and apply the smallest first fix before expanding changes.
Cite this figure — Figure F10: Symptom → evidence → isolate → fix decision tree.

H2-11. IC / Block Selection Guide (Polarization Systems)

Polarization imaging fails in “polarization-specific” ways (DoLP baseline drift, AoLP jumps, DoLP-only stripes). This guide converts those failure modes into a parts pick-list across Sensor, Sync I/O, Compute, and Calibration.

Stable DoLP threshold Continuous AoLP (no wrap jumps) Low polarization crosstalk Deterministic trigger timing Repeatable calibration

1) Lock the requirements before picking parts

Polarization parts selection becomes predictable only after four system decisions are explicit. These decisions also prevent scope creep into PoE/Interfaces/Generic ISP topics.

  • Output contract: deliver S0 only, or S0 + DoLP + AoLP (and required accuracy / stability for each).
  • Reconstruction mode: super-pixel (lower spatial resolution, simpler) vs full-resolution interpolation (better detail, higher artifact risk).
  • Motion + lighting: static / slow vs fast motion; strobe-aligned capture vs ambient only (drives sync tolerances).
  • Environment: temperature range and warm-up time (drives calibration strategy and temperature sensing needs).

If any item above is ambiguous, the selection matrix (below) will produce inconsistent “best parts” because the dominant failure mode is unclear.

2) Sensor block — what matters specifically for DoLP/AoLP

In polarization systems, the sensor is not “just sensitivity and resolution.” The sensor defines the polarization sampling geometry (super-pixel angles), and its non-idealities directly appear as DoLP/AoLP bias or texture.

  • Extinction ratio / leakage: sets the usable DoLP dynamic range; poor extinction compresses DoLP and destabilizes glare masks.
  • Angle uniformity (per-pixel angle error): drives AoLP spatial bias and calibration workload (angle map complexity).
  • Polarization crosstalk: mixes channels (0/45/90/135) and causes DoLP false high/low, especially at highlights and edges.
  • Read noise → DoLP threshold: defines the minimum signal level where DoLP becomes trustworthy (dark regions often create false polarization).
  • Black level / offset stability: small offsets can disproportionately skew DoLP when S0 is low.
Representative sensor MPN examples (polarization CMOS):
  • Sony IMX250MZR (mono) / IMX250MYR (color) — 4-direction polarization super-pixel.
  • Sony IMX264MZR (mono) / IMX264MYR (color) — same 4-direction approach, newer generation.
  • Sony IMX253MZR (mono) / IMX253MYR (color) — higher pixel count polarization option.

Screening tests to request from vendors: polarizer sweep (angle vs response), ROI DoLP variance vs illumination, and crosstalk check on specular targets.

3) Sync / Trigger I/O — “requirements only” (no PHY deep dive)

Polarization pipelines often fuse frames, apply strobe-aligned captures, or compare multiple cameras. Timing errors show up as false DoLP/AoLP change, even if S0 looks stable.

  • Trigger conditioning: clean edges and consistent thresholds prevent frame-to-frame timing jitter at the sensor/ISP boundary.
  • Skew budget: define maximum allowed Trigger→Exposure skew (µs-class for strobe use cases; tighter for fast motion).
  • Timestamp granularity: enough precision to align frames in fusion logic (no need to mention PTP/BMCA here).
  • Isolation strategy: if long trigger cables or industrial noise exist, isolate trigger/strobe lines to avoid “ghost timing.”
Representative sync / trigger IC examples (engineering building blocks):
  • Schmitt-trigger buffer for trigger cleanup: SN74LVC1G17 / SN74LVC2G17 (examples).
  • Digital isolator for trigger/strobe lines: ISO7721 (TI) / ADuM1100 (ADI) (examples).
  • High-resolution capture timer MCU (for trigger timestamping in small systems): STM32G4 family (example).

The “best” parts depend on the skew/jitter window defined in H2-7; this section only pins the requirement and typical building blocks.

4) Compute / Processing — polarization-domain hooks, not generic ISP

A polarization system is valuable only if the platform can run polarization-specific steps reliably: mosaic reorder, Stokes compute, AoLP unwrap, polarization de-moiré, and mask-based fusion. Generic ISP quality (AE/AWB/AF) is out of scope here.

  • Deterministic pixel handling: reorder (0/45/90/135) and compute S0/S1/S2 without introducing phase misalignment.
  • Polarization-domain filtering: de-moiré and smoothing must operate in DoLP/AoLP space (or use masks derived from it).
  • Fusion hooks: DoLP-based glare masks feeding intensity reconstruction (stable, controllable benefit).
  • Throughput headroom: enough margin to run “consistency stats” (frame-to-frame DoLP variance checks) for validation/field debug.
Representative compute IC examples (for polarization pipelines):
  • FPGA SoC (deterministic reorder + Stokes compute): AMD Xilinx XC7Z020 (Zynq-7020) / XCZU3EG (Zynq UltraScale+ example).
  • Vision SoC with ISP-class video blocks (to host polarization hooks): i.MX 8M Plus (NXP) / TDA4VM (TI) (examples).
  • MIPI bridge / lightweight FPGA (I/O glue for sensor-to-processing): Lattice CrossLink-NX (family example).

The selection criterion is not “AI TOPS.” It is whether polarization-domain operations (DoLP/AoLP space) are feasible at the required frame rate and latency.

5) Calibration support ICs — enable repeatable angle/gain maps

Polarization output becomes trustworthy only when calibration is practical: per-pixel angle offset, per-channel gain, leakage/extinction model, and temperature compensation. This subsection stays strictly on “enablers” (temperature sensing + LUT application), not NVM governance.

  • Temperature sensing: stable, well-placed temperature measurements support angle/DoLP temperature LUT compensation.
  • LUT application path: hardware/software must be able to apply angle map + gain map predictably at runtime.
  • Baseline monitoring: ability to log “empty-field DoLP baseline” and detect drift (ties into H2-9/H2-10).
Representative calibration-related IC examples:
  • High-accuracy digital temperature sensor: TMP117 (TI) / ADT7420 (ADI) / MCP9808 (Microchip) (examples).
  • Low-noise reference (if analog front-end offsets become DoLP-critical in custom designs): use a precision ref family per platform BOM constraints (example note).

A “good” polarization BOM is one where temperature + LUT infrastructure exists before chasing more complex de-moiré tuning.

6) Selection matrix — requirement → spec → symptom → fast screening

Use this matrix to compare candidate sensors and platforms quickly. Every spec is tied to a polarization-specific symptom and a fast screening test.

Requirement Key spec to compare If weak, typical field symptom Fast screening test (low tooling)
Glare suppression Extinction ratio, leakage stability, highlight crosstalk Glare mask unstable; over/under suppression; highlight DoLP bias Specular target: compare S0 vs DoLP mask stability across exposure sweep
Low-light reliability Read noise → DoLP threshold; black level stability Dark regions show false DoLP; DoLP variance explodes at low S0 Uniform low illumination: ROI DoLP mean/σ vs S0 (find threshold knee)
AoLP continuity Angle uniformity; demosaic sensitivity; wrap handling capability AoLP jump at edges; spatial AoLP texture in empty field Polarizer rotation + slanted-edge target: check AoLP continuity & edge stability
Texture / stripe immunity Polarization-domain de-moiré hook; crosstalk; interpolation robustness DoLP-only stripes / moiré patterns; periodic artifacts Regular grid target: compare intensity texture vs DoLP texture (polar-only stripes)
Fast motion / strobe Trigger conditioning; skew/jitter budget; timestamp precision False DoLP/AoLP change during motion; multi-camera mismatch Measure Trigger vs Exposure Active; verify DoLP stats consistency per frame
Temperature stability Temp sensor accuracy/placement; LUT availability for compensation DoLP baseline drift with warm-up; AoLP offset shifts with temperature Warm-up run: empty-field DoLP baseline vs temperature, compare with/without LUT

Figure F11 — System Selection Map (Sensor → Sync → Compute → Calibration → Output)

A polarization BOM should be reviewed as a chain: a weak link shows up as a very specific symptom (DoLP threshold, AoLP jumps, stripes, mismatch, drift).

F11 — Polarization System Selection Map Pick parts by polarization symptoms: DoLP threshold • AoLP continuity • stripes/moiré • timing mismatch • temperature drift Sensor Polar super-pixel Sync I/O Trigger / FSYNC Compute Stokes + filters Calibration Angle / gain maps Output S0 / DoLP AoLP Extinction / leakage Angle uniformity Crosstalk Read noise → DoLP Trigger cleanup Skew / jitter window Timestamp precision Isolation option Reorder + Stokes DoLP de-moiré AoLP unwrap/smooth Mask fusion hooks Angle map Gain/flat-field Temp LUT Baseline monitor Symptom → Most likely weak link (triage) DoLP too high (dark) Sensor noise / offset AoLP jumps at edges Compute unwrap / demosaic DoLP-only stripes De-moiré hook / crosstalk Multi-cam mismatch Sync skew / timestamps DoLP baseline drifts (warm-up) Calibration temp LUT Use H2-9 metrics to define pass/fail, then fill the matrix with vendor data + quick screening tests.
F11 is designed for fast design reviews: each “tag” is a compare-able spec, and each symptom points to the most likely weak link.
Cite this figure: Figure F11 — Polarization System Selection Map (Copy the anchor link when referencing in internal docs or supplier discussions.)

Request a Quote

Accepted Formats

pdf, csv, xls, xlsx, zip

Attachment

Drag & drop files here or use the button below.

H2-12. FAQs ×12 (Polarization Imaging)

Each answer stays inside this page’s evidence chain and provides two fast measurements first, then a discriminator, then the first fix.

1) DoLP is very low — sensor issue or the light is simply not polarized?

Two quick checks: (1) measure DoLP on a strong specular highlight ROI (not diffuse matte), and (2) insert a linear polarizer and rotate it while logging channel/DoLP response. If DoLP stays low even on highlights and the sweep does not show a clean sinusoidal behavior, suspect extinction/leakage or calibration. First fix: re-run angle/gain/leakage calibration and verify the illumination/optics baseline.

Maps to: H2-8 (Optics/Illumination) + H2-6 (Calibration)
2) AoLP keeps jumping — algorithm problem or synchronization problem?

Two quick checks: (1) repeat on a fully static scene and compare with a moving scene, and (2) capture Trigger vs Exposure-Active (or timestamps) to measure skew/jitter against the allowed window. If jumps happen even when static or align with wrap boundaries/low DoLP regions, suspect unwrap/interpolation artifacts. If jumps appear mainly in motion and skew exceeds budget, suspect sync alignment. First fix: stabilize timing first, then tune unwrap/edge handling.

Maps to: H2-4 (Artifacts: wrap) + H2-7 (Sync)
3) The image has stripes but intensity looks normal — is this polarization moiré?

Two quick checks: (1) compare S0 vs DoLP images; “DoLP-only stripes” strongly indicates a polarization artifact chain, and (2) change spatial frequency (distance/zoom/target pitch) and see whether stripe spacing shifts like beat patterns. If stripes move with the scene frequency, it matches moiré/beat behavior. First fix: apply polarization-domain de-moiré hooks (DoLP/AoLP space) and avoid sampling near the super-pixel periodicity.

Maps to: H2-4 (Moiré) + H2-5 (Polarization ISP hooks)
4) Glare suppression shows no improvement — is DoLP wrong or the mask strategy is wrong?

Two quick checks: (1) output three views: S0, DoLP mask, and glare-reduced S0, and (2) review calibration residuals/angle error distribution for the same setup. If the DoLP mask is unstable, inverted, or noisy on highlights, suspect leakage/angle map issues. If the mask is stable but the final image barely changes, suspect fusion thresholds/weights. First fix: fix calibration first; then tighten DoLP threshold and mask smoothing.

Maps to: H2-5 (Mask/fusion) + H2-6 (Calibration)
5) Results change after switching lenses — lens birefringence or calibration-table mismatch?

Two quick checks: (1) run an empty-field/reference target and compare DoLP/AoLP baseline before/after lens swap under identical lighting, and (2) re-run a short calibration fit (polarizer sweep) to see whether residuals drop materially. If baseline shifts with the lens and cannot be “calibrated away,” suspect birefringence/window stress. If a per-lens calibration restores stability, suspect table mismatch. First fix: maintain per-lens calibration sets and reduce stressed optics/windows.

Maps to: H2-8 (Optics effects) + H2-6 (Calibration)
6) DoLP drifts as temperature rises — what should be compensated first?

Two quick checks: (1) log empty-field DoLP baseline vs temperature during warm-up, and (2) compare whether drift is global (all ROIs) or mainly in dark regions (offset/noise-driven). Global drift typically points to angle/gain/leakage temperature dependence; dark-only drift often points to black-level/offset stability. First fix: add/validate a nearby temperature sensor and apply a temperature LUT to the most sensitive calibration term, then re-check baseline stability.

Maps to: H2-6 (Temp compensation) + H2-11 (Selection: temp/LUT capability)
7) AoLP becomes unstable on moving targets — exposure not aligned or demosaic artifacts?

Two quick checks: (1) compare static vs motion with identical lighting and exposure settings, and (2) verify Trigger/Exposure/Strobe alignment (or timestamp alignment) against the skew/jitter budget. If timing is misaligned, motion creates false polarization changes even when S0 looks reasonable. If timing is clean but instability concentrates near edges/texture, suspect demosaic/interpolation. First fix: lock timing first; then switch to a more robust reconstruction mode or edge-aware interpolation.

Maps to: H2-7 (Sync) + H2-3 (Demosaicing)
8) AoLP errors are worse near edges — distortion/optics or demosaic?

Two quick checks: (1) compare AoLP error patterns with distortion correction on vs off, and (2) use a slanted-edge target while rotating a polarizer to verify AoLP continuity at edges. If the error pattern follows geometric distortion and improves with correction, suspect optics/geometry (and window/lens effects). If the error persists and looks periodic or “wrap-like,” suspect demosaic/unwrap. First fix: apply geometry correction before Stokes, then improve edge-aware reconstruction and confidence gating.

Maps to: H2-3 (Reconstruction) + H2-8 (Optics)
9) Polarization is inconsistent after multi-camera stitching — what to verify first?

Two quick checks: (1) place a shared reference target and compare each camera’s DoLP/AoLP baseline (static) under the same lighting, and (2) measure trigger skew/timestamp offset across cameras. If baselines differ while static, suspect mismatched calibration tables, lens differences, or angle/gain maps. If baselines match but mismatch appears in motion/fusion, suspect sync skew. First fix: unify calibration procedure and versions first; then tighten the shared trigger distribution and alignment.

Maps to: H2-7 (Multi-cam sync) + H2-6 (Calibration consistency)
10) Is polarization more useful for transparent materials? When does it fail?

Polarization can help when transparent parts produce strong specular reflections or stress patterns that change DoLP/AoLP more than intensity. Two quick checks: (1) verify DoLP exists on specular highlights at practical viewing angles, and (2) confirm the system baseline is stable (empty-field DoLP not wandering). It fails when illumination/scene polarization is weak, or optics/windows introduce uncontrolled polarization bias. First fix: control lighting angle/polarization and reduce stressed windows.

Maps to: H2-1 (What is measured) + H2-8 (Optics/illumination limits)
11) How to quickly accept whether “polarization calibration was done correctly”?

Two quick checks: (1) perform a polarizer sweep on a uniform source and confirm tight fit residuals and small AoLP error distribution, and (2) check empty-field DoLP baseline (near-zero or a stable, explainable baseline) across repeats and warm-up. If residuals are wide, spatially structured, or temperature-sensitive, calibration is incomplete. First fix: redo angle/gain/leakage calibration with a stable uniform source and verify repeatability with the H2-9 pass/fail matrix.

Maps to: H2-6 (Calibration) + H2-9 (Validation metrics)
12) For inline inspection, is DoLP or AoLP more recommended to output?

DoLP is usually the first-choice output for controllable masks (glare suppression) and contrast-boost for scratches/coatings. AoLP is valuable when direction/orientation is the signal (fibers, brushed surfaces), but it requires AoLP continuity and strong DoLP confidence. Two quick checks: measure defect contrast improvement using DoLP masks, and verify AoLP stability on a reference orientation target. First fix: export both plus a confidence gate (DoLP threshold) and fuse per task.

Maps to: H2-1 (Meaning of outputs) + H2-5 (ISP hooks / fusion)