123 Main Street, New York, NY 10001

On-Board Charger (OBC): Architecture, ICs and Safety

← Back to: Automotive Electronics Assemblies

This page shows how an on-board charger fits into the vehicle, from power stage topology and control loops to sensing, isolation, safety and layout. The goal is to help engineers and procurement teams turn OBC requirements into concrete IC choices and BOM fields, so suppliers can deliver complete, automotive-grade OBC solutions instead of just loose parts.

System Role & Power Classes of the On-Board Charger

The on-board charger (OBC) is the AC–DC power module that converts grid or wall-outlet AC into a high-voltage DC bus for the traction battery. It sits between the vehicle inlet and the high-voltage battery system, coordinating charging limits with the BMS and the vehicle controller.

An OBC is not a roadside DC fast charger: DC fast chargers generate high-voltage DC outside the vehicle, whereas the OBC performs the AC–DC conversion on the vehicle. It is also different from a low-voltage DC–DC converter, which steps the high-voltage bus down to 12 V or 48 V for body and chassis loads.

From a system perspective, the OBC must deliver the required charging power at high efficiency, meet grid power-quality limits for power factor and harmonic distortion, and maintain safe coordination with the battery, contactors and vehicle networks.

Typical OBC Power Classes and Use Cases

Power class Grid & phases Typical use case Notes
3.3–3.7 kW Single-phase AC Entry-level BEVs and PHEVs with overnight home charging. Cost and size driven; efficiency still important but less extreme.
7–11 kW Single / three-phase AC Mainstream wallbox chargers for mid-range to high-range BEVs. Efficiency, thermal design and EMI performance become critical.
22 kW Three-phase AC High-end home or small public AC posts with fast turnaround. Architecturally closer to small public charging infrastructure; often SiC-based.

In this page we focus on the AC–DC on-board charger module itself. Battery management, cell balancing and state-of-health algorithms are covered in the Battery Management System (BMS) topic, while external DC charging protocols and inlet hardware are covered in the DC Fast-Charge Interface topic. Low-voltage power rails for 12 V and 48 V loads belong to the Low-Voltage DC–DC Converter topic.

Modern OBC designs are under strong pressure to deliver higher power density, peak efficiency above 95 %, robust EMI margins and automotive-grade safety levels. This drives the adoption of SiC-based power stages, digital PFC control, integrated gate drivers and strong connectivity into the vehicle networks.

On-board charger role from AC grid to high-voltage battery Diagram showing AC grid and wall box on the left, an on-board charger block in the centre and the high-voltage traction battery on the right, with three power class badges for 3.3–3.7 kW, 7–11 kW and 22 kW use cases. On-Board Charger in the EV Power Path AC grid to high-voltage traction battery AC Grid Wall Box On-Board Charger AC–DC Power Module HV Battery Traction Pack Typical OBC Power Classes 3.3–3.7 kW Single-phase home 7–11 kW Wallbox chargers 22 kW Three-phase AC From grid AC, through the OBC, to the high-voltage traction battery.

Power Stage Topologies & System Variants

From the vehicle inlet to the high-voltage bus, the on-board charger is built as a chain of power stages. A typical path is: AC inlet and protection, EMI filter, rectifier, power-factor-correction (PFC) stage, DC link capacitors, isolated DC–DC (often LLC) and finally the high-voltage DC bus that connects to the battery contactors and the BMS.

At system level the topology choice aims to meet power and efficiency targets while achieving high power factor and low harmonic distortion, managing thermal stress and making EMI compliance realistic across vehicle and grid variants.

PFC Stage Options in OBC Designs

Conventional boost PFC uses a rectifier bridge followed by a boost stage. It is mature, well understood and supported by many controllers, making it a common choice around the 3.3–3.7 kW range where cost and design simplicity are strong drivers. Efficiency is good but the bridge and boost switch conduction losses limit performance at higher power.

Bridgeless PFC reduces losses by eliminating or partially bypassing the input bridge. It improves efficiency in mid-power OBCs, but introduces more complex current paths and a tighter EMI and layout challenge. This makes it attractive for 7–11 kW tiers where incremental efficiency gains justify the added design effort.

Totem-pole PFC combines a high-frequency leg (often using SiC MOSFETs) with a low-frequency leg to emulate a rectifier and PFC stage with very low conduction loss. It is a leading choice for high-power, high-efficiency OBCs in the 11–22 kW range but demands fast gate drivers, high CMTI and carefully planned current sensing and layout, which are covered in dedicated gate-driver and current sensing topics.

Isolated DC–DC Stage Options

The isolated DC–DC stage converts the regulated DC link into a battery-compatible high-voltage output and provides galvanic isolation. LLC resonant converters are widely used in OBCs because they offer high efficiency and soft switching over a wide input range. The trade-offs in magnetic design, resonant-tank tuning and control implementation are treated in separate LLC architecture topics.

Phase-shift full-bridge (PSFB) and related hard-switched variants remain relevant in some legacy or cost-sensitive platforms. They can be simpler to control but typically place more stress on switches and magnetics. In some bidirectional OBC architectures, specialised DC–DC topologies are used to support power flow from the battery back to the grid or home installation.

Unidirectional vs. Bidirectional OBC Architectures

Unidirectional OBCs only support power flow from the grid to the battery. Their PFC and DC–DC stages, gate drivers and measurement paths are optimised for this direction, with protection focusing on over-voltage, over-current, over-temperature and insulation faults during charging.

Bidirectional OBCs enable vehicle-to-grid (V2G) or vehicle-to-home (V2H) modes. They require topologies that can reverse power flow, extended measurement and protection coverage for both directions and tighter coordination with the BMS and grid interface. Detailed bi-directional control strategies and standards are covered in dedicated V2G and DC fast-charge interface topics.

While this page focuses on the OBC power path on the high-voltage side, low-voltage DC–DC converters feeding 12 V and 48 V rails are described in the LV DC–DC converter module topic, and external DC charging hardware and protocols are handled in the DC fast-charge interface topic. This separation keeps the OBC discussion centred on the AC–DC conversion block inside the vehicle.

On-board charger power path from AC inlet to high-voltage battery Block diagram showing AC grid and EMI filter on the left, PFC stage, DC link capacitors and isolated DC-DC stage in the centre, and the high-voltage battery and vehicle networks on the right, with an isolation barrier between the power stages and low-voltage controller. OBC Power Path and Main Topology Blocks AC inlet, PFC, DC link, isolated DC–DC and high-voltage battery bus AC Grid Inlet EMI Filter Surge & Protection PFC Stage Boost / Totem-pole DC Link Bulk Caps LLC / DC–DC Isolated Stage HV Battery Bus To BMS & Contactors Isolation Barrier OBC Controller PFC & DC–DC Control Sensing Current & Voltage Vehicle Networks CAN / LIN / Ethernet

Control, Sensing & Isolation Overview

Beyond the power stages, an on-board charger relies on several interacting signal chains: the PFC control loop that shapes the input current, the isolated DC–DC control loop that regulates battery charging, a network of measurement and protection sensors and isolated communication links to the battery and vehicle controllers.

PFC Control Loop

The PFC control loop keeps the DC link voltage within its target window while shaping the input current to track the AC voltage waveform and maintain a high power factor. This can be implemented using a dedicated PFC controller IC or firmware running on a digital controller. In both cases the loop closes around AC or inductor current and DC link voltage feedback.

Typical hardware includes current sensing on the AC input or PFC inductor, DC link voltage measurement, temperature monitoring of key devices and PWM outputs to the gate drivers. Detailed current-loop and voltage-loop design, compensation and stability analysis are handled in dedicated PFC controller topics rather than on this OBC page.

LLC / DC–DC Control Loop

The isolated DC–DC stage control loop regulates the high-voltage output that feeds the traction battery across a wide operating range. Depending on topology, the controller adjusts switching frequency, phase shift or both to achieve soft switching, protect the transformer and magnetic components and keep losses low across operating points.

This loop relies on measurements of primary or secondary currents, output voltage and several temperature sensors on transformer cores and power devices. Instantaneous peak currents are used to enforce hard limits, while averaged values control charging profiles requested by the BMS. The underlying resonant and full-bridge control schemes are described in LLC and DC–DC controller architecture topics.

Measurement & Protection Sensing

Around these main loops, the OBC includes a measurement layer that feeds both control and protection. Key points include high-voltage bus voltage, AC input or PFC inductor current, DC link capacitor current or temperature and the temperatures of power semiconductors, magnetics and heatsinks. These signals support efficiency optimisation, thermal management and protection sequencing.

A subset of these measurements is classified as safety-related. High-voltage bus over-voltage, over-current on the battery side, critical device temperatures and insulation-monitor outputs feed safety monitors and may be acquired by redundant channels or hardware comparators. The detailed design of shunt, isolated amplifier and sigma-delta measurement circuits is covered in the current sensing and power measurement domain.

Isolation & Communication Links

Signal chains must cross isolation barriers between the high-voltage power domain and the low-voltage control domain. Isolated gate drivers carry PWM signals to the PFC and DC–DC switches, while isolated amplifiers or sigma-delta modulators bring current and voltage information back to the controller. Digital isolators or isolated transceivers link the OBC controller to CAN, LIN or Ethernet networks that sit on the vehicle side of the barrier.

Through these communication links the OBC exchanges charging limits, status and diagnostics with the BMS and vehicle control unit. Details of network protocols, update mechanisms and cyber security belong to in-vehicle networking and gateway topics, while isolation device selection and CMTI performance are covered in dedicated isolation and gate-driver pages.

Control, sensing and isolation paths in an on-board charger Block diagram showing PFC and DC-DC control blocks, current and voltage sensing, an isolation barrier, the OBC controller and vehicle networks for CAN, LIN and Ethernet. OBC Control, Sensing & Isolation Control loops, measurement points and signal paths PFC CTRL I / V loop DC–DC CTRL LLC / Bridge I / V Sense HV bus, AC, temp Protection OV / OC / OT Isolation Barrier OBC Controller PWM, ADC, faults Vehicle Networks CAN / LIN / ETH

Isolation Strategy, ASIL & Diagnostics

The on-board charger is part of the high-voltage traction system and must meet automotive functional safety expectations while remaining safely isolated from the vehicle body and low-voltage domains. This section looks at safety integrity levels, isolation planning and the diagnostic signals that feed protection and system monitoring.

Functional Safety Levels in OBC Applications

Many OBC implementations carry functions allocated around ASIL B or ASIL C, while the overall traction system safety goal is closed together with the BMS and vehicle controller. Safety-relevant behaviour includes preventing over-charging, managing over-current and over-temperature events and placing the system into a defined safe state when critical faults are detected.

In practice this means that selected sensing channels, protection thresholds and shut-down paths must be designed with diagnostic coverage, failure detection and safe reaction in mind. The detailed safety concept, including decomposition and safety cases, is typically handled at the vehicle platform level and is referenced by the OBC design.

Functions Requiring Redundancy or Self-Checking

Several OBC functions are strong candidates for redundancy or self-tests. High-voltage bus over-voltage and battery-side over-current protection often use both sampled measurements and hardware comparators to enforce hard limits. Critical device temperature sensors can be checked against plausibility windows or backed up by secondary sensing points.

Insulation monitoring between the high-voltage system and chassis typically reports a fault flag that must be acted on by the OBC, either by preventing charging or by forcing a controlled shut-down. Loss of communication with the BMS or vehicle controller also requires a defined safe reaction, such as reducing power or terminating charging after a timeout.

Isolation Strategy & Safety Standards

The OBC isolation strategy separates the high-voltage power domain from low-voltage control electronics and the vehicle body. Isolation is achieved through the main power transformer in the DC–DC stage, isolated gate drivers, isolated current and voltage feedback paths, isolation monitoring hardware and PCB creepage and clearance consistent with automotive insulation classes.

Standards such as IEC 61851 for conductive charging systems and general insulation and spacing rules from IEC 62368 and IEC 60664 influence the choice of insulation level, test voltages and allowable creepage and clearance distances. This page only references the role of these standards; detailed creepage tables, insulation coordination and packaging trade-offs are addressed in dedicated isolation and safety-packaging topics.

Diagnostic & Monitoring Signals

Safety and diagnostic functions rely on a structured set of signals. These include over-current detection on the battery and power-stage paths, over-voltage detection on the HV bus and DC link, over-temperature sensing on power semiconductors, magnetics and capacitors and the output of the insulation monitoring device. Many of these are exposed both as ADC channels and as discrete PG or FAULT pins.

Fault flags and status registers from gate drivers, supervisors, power monitors and communication transceivers feed the safety layer and are forwarded to the BMS and vehicle controller. General safety architectures for power monitoring, redundant channels and system-level fault handling are described in safety architecture and power monitoring topics; the OBC page focuses on which signals must exist and how they relate to charging behaviour.

Safety, isolation and diagnostics in an on-board charger Block diagram showing the OBC power stage, a safety and diagnostics block, hazard icons and connections to the battery management system and vehicle controller over CAN or Ethernet. OBC Safety, Isolation & Diagnostics Safe shut-down paths and status reporting OBC Power Stage PFC & DC–DC OV OC OT ISO Safety & Diagnostics ASIL Functions BMS / VCU Vehicle Controller CAN / Ethernet Isolation Boundary Safe Shut-down Status & Faults Safety functions watch for OV, OC, OT and insulation faults and report them to the vehicle.

IC Categories & 7-Brand Mapping for the OBC

This section groups on-board charger ICs by function and maps them across seven major automotive suppliers. The goal is to help engineering and procurement teams quickly identify relevant MCU, power, sensing, isolation and communication families that are commonly used in OBC designs, together with examples of part numbers and the reasons they fit this application.

Control & Digital

Control and digital devices run the PFC and DC–DC algorithms, interface to vehicle networks and host safety and diagnostic software. Typical choices are automotive MCUs or DSPs with fast ADCs and PWM units, dedicated PFC and LLC controllers and safety PMICs and supervisors that support functional safety goals.

IC Type TI ST NXP Renesas onsemi Microchip Others
Automotive MCU / DSP for OBC control C2000™ TMS320F28004x / F28002x
(digital PFC + LLC, fast ADC, HRPWM)
SPC58ECxx, STM32G4 series
(powertrain-class MCU, PWM + ADC)
S32K3x, MPC5744P
(ASIL-capable MCUs with CAN FD / ETH)
RH850/P1M, RH850/F1K
(HV domain control, safety features)
NCV family MCU offerings
(platform-specific, limited range)
dsPIC33CK / dsPIC33CH
(dual-core digital power control)
Infineon AURIX™ TC3xx / TC4x
(multi-core safety MCU for OBC / inverter)
Dedicated PFC controller UCC28070A, UCC28180
(interleaved, CCM PFC with full protections)
L4984A, L6564
(transition / CCM PFC controllers)
TEA1716 family
(PFC + DC–DC combo for off-line supplies)
R2A20114 / relatives
(PFC controllers for AC–DC front ends)
NCP1616 / NCP1654
(CCM PFC with brownout / OVP functions)
Infineon ICE3PCS02/3,
ICE2PCS0x PFC controllers
LLC / isolated DC–DC controller UCC256404 / UCC256402
(resonant LLC, soft-start, high efficiency)
L6599A, L6591
(half-bridge LLC controllers for OBC)
TEA19161 / TEA2017x
(LLC / combo controllers for chargers)
RAA289041, ISL6753x
(high-performance LLC / PWM controllers)
NCP1399, NCP1397
(frequency-controlled LLC, protections)
Infineon ICE2HS01G, L6599-like
resonant controllers
Safety PMIC / supervisor / watchdog TPS65381A-Q1, TPS65386-Q1,
TPS386000-Q1 supervisors
STPMIC1x, STM/ASIL supervisors
(multi-rail PMIC for MCU + gate drivers)
FS84x / FS85x PMIC
(ASIL-ready, multi-rail, watchdog, LDOs)
RAA271000 / RAJ280002
(PMIC with safety features for RH850)
NCV84xx watchdogs, NCV89xx PMIC
(monitoring + reset for automotive)
MCP1316 / MCP1320 supervisors,
MCP19xx watchdogs
Infineon TLF35584 / TLF35585
(safety PMIC for AURIX platforms)

In OBC projects, MCU and DSP families such as TI C2000, ST SPC58, NXP S32K and Infineon AURIX are attractive because they combine fast ADCs, flexible PWM units and rich networking with automotive-grade safety documentation. Dedicated PFC and LLC controllers from multiple vendors simplify interleaved PFC and resonant stage design, while safety PMIC and supervisor devices provide the monitored power rails, watchdogs and reset sequencing needed to meet ASIL targets.

Power & Gate Drive

Gate drivers and power-interface ICs connect the control loops to SiC and MOSFET power stages. They must withstand high dv/dt, provide fast and symmetric drive strengths, integrate fault detection such as DESAT and support safe turn-off during short-circuit and over-current events.

IC Type TI ST NXP Renesas onsemi Microchip Others
Isolated SiC / MOSFET gate drivers UCC21520A-Q1, UCC21710-Q1,
UCC53xx-Q1 (isolated, DESAT options)
STGAP2S / STGAP4S series
(isolated gate drivers for SiC / IGBT)
GD3000 family
(multi-phase gate drivers for traction / OBC)
RAJ293000 / RAJ280002
(driver and power-stage combos)
NCP51561 / NCP51530,
NCV51710 for SiC / MOSFET
MCP14E10 / MCP87xxx
(high-speed gate drivers, industrial / auto)
Infineon 1EDxE / 2EDxE
(EiceDRIVER™ isolated drivers)
Half-bridge / bridge drivers with protection DRV8xxx-Q1 family,
UCC27282-Q1 half-bridge drivers
L6491 / L6498
(half-bridge drivers for PFC / DC–DC)
MC33883 / MC33937A
(gate drivers with protection)
HIP2103 / HIP2104 bridges
(legacy half-bridge drivers)
NCV51705, NCV51197
(bridge drivers for automotive power)
Infineon 2ED218x, 2ED2185
half-bridge drivers for OBC
Gate-driver helpers & protection front-ends UCC27511-Q1, UCC27524-Q1
(non-isolated boost drivers, Miller clamps)
STTH / protection diodes,
discrete clamps and TVS lines
External DESAT networks,
TVS and surge devices
RAA489000 analog front-ends,
protection discretes
NCV84xx, ESD / TVS devices
(surge and clamp support)
MCP14A0x, protection diodes
for gate shaping and clamp
Infineon bipolar clamps,
ADI analog protection parts

OBC power stages increasingly rely on isolated gate drivers capable of handling SiC-level dv/dt while still integrating DESAT, soft turn-off and Miller clamp functions. Families such as TI UCC21xx/UCC217xx, ST STGAP, onsemi NCP51xx and Infineon EiceDRIVER devices are widely used. Half-bridge and bridge drivers with built-in protections reduce external component count, while discrete helpers and clamps still matter for fine-tuning switching performance and robustness.

Measurement & Isolation

Measurement and isolation ICs capture high-voltage currents, bus voltages and temperatures and bring them safely into the control domain. Shunt amplifiers and sigma-delta modulators provide precise current feedback, while high-voltage monitors, isolated amplifiers and digital isolators maintain galvanic separation between the HV stages and low-voltage logic.

IC Type TI ST NXP Renesas onsemi Microchip Others
Shunt current-sense amplifiers (non-isolated) INA240A-Q1, INA293-Q1
(bidirectional, fast, high CMRR)
TSC103, TSC2011
(high-side current-sense amplifiers)
ISL28022 / ISL28034
(precision current- and power-monitors)
NCV2187, NCV51705 front-ends
(current-sense and monitor support)
MCP6C02, MCP6C04
(zero-drift current-sense amplifiers)
ADI MAX40056 / AD8210
(high-voltage current-sense amplifiers)
Isolated ΣΔ modulators / amplifiers AMC1301-Q1, AMC1306Mx-Q1
(isolated shunt ΣΔ for PFC / DC–DC)
— (often uses third-party
isolated amplifiers)
ISL2863x, ISL28005
(measurable front-end + isolation combos)
ADuM7703 / ADuM7701
(isolated ΣΔ current/voltage sensing)
High-voltage voltage monitors / dividers TLVH431-Q1, TL431-Q1
(precision shunt references for monitors)
TS430 / TS507
(references and op-amps for monitors)
SGF / analog front-ends
(platform-specific solutions)
ISL60002, ISL2100x
(references for HV divider networks)
NCP431, NCV431
(references used with discrete dividers)
MCP1501, MCP1525
(precision references for sensing rails)
ADI ADR44x / ADR45x
(low-drift reference families)
Digital isolators / isolated transceivers ISO7741-Q1 digital isolators,
ISO1042-Q1 isolated CAN
STISOx isolators,
L9616 (LIN) with discrete isolation
TJA1052 / TJA1044 CAN FD,
often used with discrete isolators
RAA271000 + galvanic isolators
for CAN / LIN
NCV734x CAN transceivers,
digital isolators via partners
MCP2562FD CAN FD,
MCP25625 with integrated controller
ADuM120x / ADuM240x,
ADuM540x isoPower solutions

For OBC applications, low-offset shunt amplifiers and isolated sigma-delta modulators are key to obtaining accurate current and voltage feedback across temperature and lifetime, especially on SiC-based stages. Digital isolators and isolated CAN transceivers from TI, ST, NXP, Microchip and ADI are widely used to bridge the isolation barrier while maintaining EMC performance and robust communications.

Communication & Interface

Communication and interface ICs connect the on-board charger to the battery management system, vehicle control unit and in some platforms to Ethernet-based gateways or V2G infrastructure. CAN FD, LIN and automotive Ethernet PHYs are the primary building blocks, with optional PLC and V2G front-ends in advanced systems.

IC Type TI ST NXP Renesas onsemi Microchip Others
CAN FD transceivers TCAN1042-Q1, TCAN1043A-Q1
(CAN FD, low-power modes)
— (often uses NXP / TI
transceivers in platforms)
TJA1044GT, TJA1051T
(robust CAN FD for EV / OBC)
RAA170832, RAA270005
(CAN / LIN combo transceivers)
NCV734x family
(AEC-Q100 CAN transceivers)
MCP2562FD, MCP2561FD
(CAN FD with low EMC emissions)
ADI ADM3055E (CAN with isolation)
LIN transceivers TLIN1029-Q1 family
(LIN 2.x transceivers)
L9616, L9618
(LIN transceivers in body / power modules)
UJA1169, TJA1021
(LIN with integrated regulators / wake-up)
RAA270205 LIN transceivers
(platform dependent)
NCV742x LIN transceivers
(sleep / wake support)
MCP2003, MCP2004
(LIN transceivers, classic EV/BMS support)
ADI / Infineon LIN families
(used in some platforms)
Automotive Ethernet PHY (100BASE-T1 / 1000BASE-T1) DP83TC811-Q1, DP83TG720-Q1
(automotive single-pair Ethernet PHY)
STETHx automotive PHY series
(for gateway / OBC integration)
TJA1102, TJA1103
(100BASE-T1 PHY for zonal/gateway)
R-Car / RH850 platforms with
external automotive PHYs
NCV8741 / partners’ PHYs
in reference designs
KSZ9131MNX, KSZ8061MNX
(automotive Ethernet PHYs)
Broadcom, Marvell, ADI
automotive PHY families
PLC / V2G front-ends (option) PLC analog front-ends in
reference V2G solutions
GreenPHY / V2G front-ends in
dedicated chipset offerings
ADI / Infineon PLC front-ends
(HomePlug GreenPHY, ISO 15118)

In many OBCs, a simple CAN FD link to the BMS and a second CAN or Ethernet link to the vehicle gateway are sufficient. NXP TJA10xx, TI TCAN10xx and Microchip MCP2562 families are frequently chosen because they offer robust EMC, low-power modes and automotive qualification. Ethernet PHY choices depend on whether the OBC is a simple node on the backbone or part of a more integrated powertrain domain controller.

Bias & Auxiliary Power

Bias and auxiliary power ICs generate the low-voltage rails for controllers, gate drivers, sensors and communication transceivers. Typical building blocks are off-line or high-voltage flyback controllers for housekeeping supplies, DC–DC buck or buck-boost converters for local rails and voltage references and supervisors for monitored start-up and reset.

IC Type TI ST NXP Renesas onsemi Microchip Others
Off-line / HV flyback controllers UCC28780-Q1, UCC28730-Q1
(high-efficiency off-line flyback)
VIPer0P / VIPer26Kx
(integrated MOSFET flyback controllers)
TEA1733, TEA1755
(AC–DC auxiliary supply controllers)
ISL675x, RAA2230xx
(PWM / quasi-resonant flyback controllers)
NCP1014 / NCP1207,
AEC-Q variants for aux supplies
Infineon CoolSET™ families
(integrated MOSFET flyback)
Auxiliary DC–DC converters / PMICs LM53603-Q1, LM5180-Q1,
TPS54360-Q1 buck / fly-buck
L7987-L, L596x,
A698x buck families
MC34xxx regulators,
SJA/TEA platform-specific PMICs
ISL8xxx / RAA2xxx PMICs
(multi-rail for MCU + drivers)
NCV890100, NCV89133
(automotive buck converters)
MCP16331, MCP1630x
(compact buck / boost converters)
Infineon TLF
LDOs, references & supervisors TPS7A16-Q1, TLV700-Q1 LDOs,
TL431-Q1, TPS386xxx supervisors
LD1117Sx, LDPower series,
STM supervisors for MCU rails
MC3390x LDOs,
watchdog and reset ICs
ISL80101, ISL21010 references,
RA/RL78 supply supervisors
NCV8187 / NCV870x LDOs,
NCV84xx watchdog / reset
MIC29302, MCP1755 LDOs,
MCP100 / MCP1316 supervisors
ADI LT30xx LDOs, LTC29xx
supervisors for monitored rails

Auxiliary supplies in an OBC must tolerate wide input ranges, hot environments and strong EMI while remaining small and efficient. Flyback controllers, buck converters and PMICs from TI, ST, Renesas, onsemi and others cover most of these needs, while robust LDOs, references and supervisors protect sensitive control and sensing circuits from undervoltage, overvoltage and unstable power conditions.

Layout, Isolation Barrier & EMI Considerations

This section turns the on-board charger topology and safety strategy into layout-level guidance. It is written so that a layout or hardware lead can turn each bullet into a checklist item during design reviews. The focus is on physical partitioning, isolation barrier routing, EMI and grounding strategy and thermal placement rather than detailed formulas.

Physical Partitioning & Power Zones

Partitioning the PCB and mechanics into clear functional zones helps control current loops, EMI and safety distances. The goal is to keep high-energy switching areas compact and predictable while giving low-voltage control and sensing circuits a quiet environment.

  • AC Input & EMI Zone – Place fuses, surge arresters, X/Y capacitors, common-mode chokes and line filters near the AC inlet and mains connector. Keep the DM filter loop between line, neutral and bridge input as tight as possible and provide a clean path for Y-capacitor currents to chassis or vehicle ground.
  • PFC Zone – Group the PFC inductor, PFC switches, bridge rectifier and current-sense components into a compact island. Minimise the high-frequency loop formed by the PFC switch, PFC diode/bridge and DC link capacitor. Avoid routing this loop underneath control or sensing circuits.
  • LLC / DC–DC Zone – Place the resonant tank (transformer and resonant capacitors), main bridge and secondary rectifiers close together. Keep primary switching loops short and symmetric and align the secondary current path to the DC bus and battery interface. Do not snake HV outputs through low-voltage areas.
  • HV DC Bus & HV Battery Interface Zone – Position DC link capacitors, busbars, contactors and the HV connector as a coherent block. The DC link capacitor bank should sit physically between PFC and DC–DC zones to minimise stray inductance. Reserve sufficient creepage and clearance around busbars, contactor terminals and the battery connector.
  • Control Board / Low-Voltage Logic Zone – Locate MCU/DSP, gate-driver control sides, current/voltage front-ends, PMICs and communication PHYs on the low-voltage side, clearly separated from HV copper. Keep sensitive analogue sensing near the low-voltage side of isolation devices and give digital domains (MCU cores, Ethernet PHYs, clocks) their own well-routed areas.

Package-level decisions, power module footprints and mechanical details such as busbars and brackets are handled in the dedicated power-stage modules and packaging topics. Here the emphasis is on defining clean zones that naturally support those choices.

Isolation Barrier Routing & Creepage Awareness

The isolation barrier should be visible on the PCB as a deliberate strip that separates high-voltage power and sensing from low-voltage control and communication. Both signal crossings and isolated power supplies must respect this physical boundary.

  • Define a clear isolation “band” – Reserve a continuous region where no copper or components cross between the HV domain and the LV domain except through isolation devices. Group all isolated gate drivers, isolated amplifiers and digital isolators along this band.
  • Bundle signal crossings – Route PWM pairs, sigma-delta data, SPI/I²C links and CAN/Ethernet signals that cross the barrier as tight bundles with controlled spacing. Avoid single “stray” crossings that are easy to miss in review.
  • Separate isolated power rails – Keep HV-side driver supplies and LV-side controller supplies clearly separated. Use dedicated isolated converters (fly-buck, flyback or transformer-based modules) and avoid returning any auxiliary supply ground across the barrier without a deliberate isolation element.
  • Creepage and clearance awareness – Around the isolation band, maximise clearance by pulling back copper, enlarging pad spacing and using slots or cut-outs where required. Detailed creepage/clearance tables and insulation coordination are defined in isolation and safety-packaging topics; this page focuses on making the barrier visible and reviewable in the layout.

EMI & Grounding Strategy (Common-Mode vs Differential)

EMI behaviour in an OBC is dominated by differential-mode switching loops and common-mode coupling to chassis, vehicle ground and heatsinks. The aim is to keep switching loops compact, give common-mode currents a controlled path and avoid random return paths through sensitive circuits.

  • Differential-mode loops – Keep the high-frequency loops of the PFC and LLC stages (switch–diode–capacitor/inductor) as small and planar as possible. Use solid reference planes under these loops and avoid routing low-level signals perpendicular to them.
  • Common-mode paths – Identify high dv/dt nodes and their capacitive coupling to heatsinks, shields, enclosure and vehicle ground. Provide intentional common-mode paths through Y capacitors and filters so that common-mode currents do not search for unintended return routes.
  • Ground partitioning – Separate HV power ground, analogue sensing ground and digital/communication ground. Define where these regions meet (for example at a star point near the controller) and avoid large power currents flowing through the analogue ground plane.
  • OBC-specific EMI concerns – Consider mains-side conducted emissions, coupling to vehicle ground networks and to large heatsinks or cold plates. Ensure heatsinks attached to high dv/dt switches are either tied to a controlled potential or shielded to prevent radiated emissions from coupling into harnesses and the vehicle body.

Detailed filter design, emission limits and test setups are handled in the EMC / EMI subsystem topics. Here the focus is on the placement and routing decisions that give those filters a fair chance to work.

Thermal Layout & Package Placement

Thermal layout ensures that PFC and DC–DC switches, magnetics and DC link capacitors operate within their limits over lifetime. Mechanical and cooling concepts differ by platform, but certain placement rules are common across OBC designs.

  • Locate high-loss devices on defined cooling paths – Place PFC and DC–DC MOSFETs or SiC modules, high-current rectifiers and main magnetics where they can couple efficiently to heatsinks, cold plates or airflow. Avoid stacking several major heat sources into a corner that has poor cooling access.
  • Protect lifetime-critical components – Position electrolytic capacitors, film capacitors and current-sense shunts away from the hottest areas or provide shielding copper and airflow to keep their case temperatures under control.
  • Place temperature sensors at meaningful points – Attach sensors where they track real stress: on the body or terminals of electrolytics, close to hot windings or cores of inductors and transformers and near the hottest positions on MOSFET or SiC module copper. Ensure the sensing points align with the safety and derating strategy.
  • Coordinate with power-module and mechanical design – Use OBC layout reviews to check that module footprints, mounting hardware and thermal interfaces match the cooling concept. Detailed package comparisons and module-level thermal guidance are covered in the power stage modules and packaging topics.
OBC Layout Zones and Isolation Barrier Layout diagram showing AC input and EMI zone, PFC zone, LLC/DC-DC zone, HV battery interface, and control/low-voltage area separated by an isolation barrier. OBC Layout Zones & Isolation PCB placement view for review checklist AC / EMI Filters & fuses PFC Zone Boost / Totem-pole LLC / DC–DC Resonant stage HV DC Bus to Battery Isolation Control & LV MCU / Sensing / Comms Zone placement helps enforce EMI, safety & thermal rules.

BOM & Procurement Notes for the OBC

This section helps procurement teams and small to mid-volume integrators express the OBC requirements as clear BOM and RFQ fields. Instead of listing only part numbers, the aim is to describe the AC input, power levels, safety goals, communication interfaces and environment so that suppliers can propose suitable IC families, power modules and reference designs.

Core Required BOM Fields

The following fields should be filled in for every OBC project. They can be placed in the header of the BOM, in an RFQ template or in the design requirements document that accompanies the part list.

  • AC input voltage range – e.g. “85–265 VAC single-phase” or “3× 380–480 VAC three-phase”.
  • AC input phases and frequency – single / three-phase, 50/60 Hz or specified frequency range.
  • Target output power and efficiency – e.g. “7.4 kW, ≥96% at 230 VAC and nominal battery voltage”.
  • Power factor and THD limits – e.g. “PF ≥ 0.99, THD < 5% at nominal load”.
  • OBC directionality and V2G/V2H support – unidirectional or bidirectional; specify if ISO 15118 / V2G capabilities are required.
  • HV battery voltage range – e.g. “250–450 V” or “400–800 V”.
  • Maximum charge current and profiles – e.g. “up to 32 A continuous, support for constant-current/constant-voltage and derating at high temperature”.
  • Functional safety target – target ASIL level for OBC functions (e.g. ASIL B / C contribution) and whether safety MCU/PMIC support is required (safety manual, FMEDA, certified libraries).
  • Communication interfaces – internal (CAN FD, LIN, 100BASE-T1 / 1000BASE-T1 Ethernet) and external interfaces (PLC for ISO 15118, diagnostic UART, service port).
  • Diagnostic and logging requirements – whether the OBC must expose detailed fault codes, counters and lifetime data over CAN or Ethernet.
  • Environmental conditions – ambient or housing temperature range (e.g. “-40…+105 °C”), IP rating (e.g. IP54, IP67), expected humidity and condensation conditions.
  • Vibration and mechanical requirements – reference to the applicable automotive vibration standard (e.g. ISO 16750) or OEM internal specifications, including mounting constraints and connector orientation.

Optional Selection Fields

The next set of fields help align expectations between engineering and suppliers. They are not always mandatory but give a clearer picture of preferred architectures and IC types.

  • PFC controller type – analog / digital (MCU-based) / combo controller. This indicates whether the PFC will be governed by a dedicated analog IC, a digital control platform or a combined PFC + DC–DC controller.
  • PFC topology – e.g. “single-phase boost”, “interleaved boost” or “totem-pole PFC (Si / SiC)”. This strongly influences gate-driver choice and EMI behaviour.
  • DC–DC topology – e.g. “LLC resonant”, “phase-shift full bridge” or “dual-active-bridge” for bidirectional systems.
  • Power switch technology – Si MOSFET, SiC MOSFET or mixed. This guides the selection of gate drivers, isolation, layout rules and cooling approach.
  • Gate driver isolation strength – basic / reinforced / reinforced with DESAT and soft turn-off / specifically rated for SiC. This indicates how much integrated protection is expected in the driver stage.
  • Current and voltage measurement implementation – shunt-based with simple amplifiers, isolated amplifiers, sigma-delta modulators or integrated power monitors. This influences both accuracy and safety architecture.
  • Safety architecture hint – single-channel monitored, dual-channel monitored, or external safety MCU supervising the OBC controller and power stages.
  • Preferred IC ecosystem – if the platform prefers a dominant supplier for MCU, gate drivers and PMIC (e.g. “TI C2000-based”, “AURIX-based”), this field helps align suggested IC families with corporate strategy.

Example BOM Requirement Combinations

The table below shows how the fields above can be combined into short, descriptive “solution lines”. They are written as combinations of topology, control and interface choices, without tying the design to specific part numbers.

Use Case / Power Class Topology & Switch Technology Control & Sensing Stack Communication & Safety Notes
7.4 kW single-phase, unidirectional home OBC Interleaved boost PFC + LLC DC–DC, Si MOSFETs on PFC and DC–DC, discrete PFC controller and LLC controller. TI C2000-class or similar MCU for overall control, shunt-based current sensing with isolated sigma-delta modulators on HV side, safety PMIC with watchdog and monitored rails. CAN FD link to BMS, LIN or CAN for vehicle diagnostics. System-level safety goal around ASIL B, OBC providing monitored shutdown and fault reporting.
11 kW single/three-phase OBC for wallbox applications Totem-pole PFC (SiC) + LLC DC–DC, SiC devices on PFC, Si MOSFETs or SiC on DC–DC. Digital PFC and DC–DC control preferred. Safety MCU or DSP platform with high-resolution PWM, isolated gate drivers with DESAT and soft turn-off, isolated sigma-delta sensing on both PFC and DC–DC stages, safety PMIC with ASIL-ready documentation. CAN FD to BMS, 100BASE-T1 to gateway for firmware updates and diagnostics. Target system safety goal towards ASIL C when combined with the BMS.
22 kW three-phase bidirectional OBC with V2G readiness 3-phase boost PFC or Vienna rectifier + dual-active-bridge DC–DC, full SiC modules on both stages, fully bidirectional power flow. High-performance safety MCU platform (e.g. AURIX / S32K3x-class) with separate control cores for PFC and DC–DC, redundant current sensing (shunt + fluxgate or dual shunts), advanced thermal monitoring and comprehensive fault logging. Redundant CAN FD plus automotive Ethernet, PLC front-end for ISO 15118 V2G communication. Safety concept assumes ASIL C contribution from the OBC within the traction high-voltage domain.

These examples are starting points. In practice, project teams can copy the field names into their own BOM templates and adjust the values to match vehicle architecture, OEM standards and preferred semiconductor ecosystems. Detailed IC family choices and part-number-level recommendations remain in the IC categories and seven-brand mapping section, keeping the BOM fields stable even when device selections evolve.

Request a Quote

Accepted Formats

pdf, csv, xls, xlsx, zip

Attachment

Drag & drop files here or use the button below.

FAQs about On-Board Chargers (OBC)

These twelve questions highlight the main decisions behind an on-board charger design: power rating, topology, SiC adoption, sensing, isolation, safety levels, interfaces and BOM planning.

What is the difference between an on-board charger and a DC fast charger?
An on-board charger (OBC) is mounted in the vehicle and converts AC mains into high voltage DC for the traction battery. A DC fast charger is installed roadside and performs the AC to DC conversion externally, then feeds regulated DC through a high power interface. The OBC is power-limited and space-constrained, the DC charger is larger and more complex.
What factors should I consider when choosing the power rating of an OBC?
OBC power rating is mainly driven by battery capacity, desired charging time and the AC connection realistically available to the user. Residential installations may be limited to single phase and modest breaker sizes, while fleets or public chargers can use three phase. Higher power increases cooling, size and cost, so requirements should be balanced against usage patterns.
Why are high-power OBC designs increasingly using totem-pole PFC?
Totem-pole PFC removes the diode bridge losses and lets designers run with higher efficiency, especially at higher power and wide input ranges. It also helps meet tight power factor and THD limits. The trade-off is more complex control and very fast switching edges, which usually require SiC devices, careful gate driving and tighter EMI layout practices.
When is it necessary to use SiC devices instead of traditional MOSFETs in an OBC?
SiC switches become attractive when power levels move beyond roughly 11 kilowatts, when efficiency targets are very aggressive or when cooling and volume are tight. They support higher switching frequencies and lower losses than silicon MOSFETs, allowing smaller magnetics and filters. For lower power single-phase chargers, Si MOSFETs can remain cost-effective if efficiency and size targets are moderate.
Which key measurement points does an OBC need to ensure safety and efficiency?
An OBC typically measures AC input current, DC link voltage, primary and secondary power stage currents, battery voltage and charge current, plus temperatures of capacitors, magnetics and power devices. These points feed the PFC and DC-DC control loops, thermal management and protection logic, enabling accurate power control, fault detection and lifetime monitoring aligned with the functional safety concept.
How should I plan the isolation barrier and communication interfaces in an OBC?
Start by drawing a clear line between the high voltage power domain and the low voltage control domain. All crossings should use isolated gate drivers, isolated amplifiers or digital isolators and isolated transceivers where needed. Place CAN, LIN and Ethernet PHYs on the low voltage side, with defined paths for diagnostics and firmware updates, and keep the isolation band visible in the PCB layout.
What functional safety levels and diagnostic mechanisms are common in OBCs?
Many OBCs contribute to an overall system goal around ASIL B or ASIL C, together with the BMS and vehicle controller. Typical diagnostics include monitored over- current, over-voltage, under-voltage, over-temperature and insulation faults, watchdog supervision of control software and safe shutdown paths that disable gate drivers and open contactors while reporting faults over CAN or Ethernet to the rest of the vehicle.
How do the requirements for controllers and sensors differ between unidirectional and bidirectional OBCs?
Unidirectional OBCs only manage power from grid to battery, so control and sensing are optimised for charging. Bidirectional designs must handle power flow in both directions, often with tighter accuracy and stability requirements, more operating modes and more complex protection logic. They usually need higher performance MCUs or SoCs and truly bidirectional current sensing with robust isolation and diagnostics.
How do the OBC and BMS cooperate over CAN or Ethernet?
The BMS defines what the battery can safely accept in terms of voltage, current and temperature and sends those limits to the OBC over CAN or Ethernet. The OBC then regulates its PFC and DC-DC stages accordingly and reports status, measured values and faults back. Timeouts, plausibility checks and fault codes form part of the overall safety and diagnostic concept.
Which parameters matter most when selecting gate drivers for an OBC?
Key gate driver parameters include gate voltage range, peak source and sink current, support for negative turn-off levels, allowed dv/dt and CMTI rating, turn-on and turn-off timing and integrated protection such as DESAT, soft turn-off and UVLO. The isolation rating and package also need to match the high voltage domain and creepage and clearance strategy used in the design.
How can I clearly express OBC power and safety requirements in the BOM?
Rather than stating only an OBC power value, describe the AC input voltage and phase options, target output power and efficiency at a defined operating point, required power factor and THD, battery voltage and current range, the target ASIL level and whether a safety MCU or PMIC is required, plus the desired communication interfaces such as CAN FD, Ethernet or PLC.
What IC categories are typically included in a complete OBC solution from a supplier?
A complete OBC solution normally covers control MCUs or DSPs with matching safety PMICs, PFC and DC-DC controllers, Si or SiC gate drivers, current and voltage sensing and isolation, CAN, LIN and Ethernet transceivers and PLC front-ends where needed, plus auxiliary flyback and DC-DC regulators, references and supervisors. Together these families let you build a coherent, automotive-grade OBC platform.