123 Main Street, New York, NY 10001

What This Page Covers

We cover boost and buck-boost controllers from an engineering perspective: control methods (voltage/current-mode, peak/valley sensing, slope compensation), loop compensation (Type-II/III), power-stage pairing (inductor, diode/synchronous FET, output capacitors), start-up and fault handling, and EMI/layout—plus selection criteria and a practical design flow.

To avoid duplication with sibling pages, this page does not cover buck-only topics, multiphase/IMVP/load-line, PMBus/telemetry, integrated power modules, or charging/BMS. Please use the links below for those areas.

Synchronous Buck Controller Buck topics live here (no overlap) Multiphase Controller IMVP, load-line, phase balancing PMBus Power System Manager Telemetry, sequencing, margining eFuse & Protection ICs System-level inrush & fault isolation Power Modules Fully-integrated regulators (separate)

Prefer a top-down view? Return to the PMIC Hub for terminology alignment and cross-page navigation.

Boost Family Topologies — Choose by VIN/VOUT Relation & Ripple Path

Pick a topology by how VIN and VOUT relate, where the ripple current flows, and what magnetics and EMI constraints you can accept. This section stays at the controller + power-stage pairing level—device lists live on regulator/module pages.

Non-inverting vs inverting buck-boost, SEPIC and Ćuk topology map for quick selection by VIN/VOUT relation and ripple path.
Select by VIN/VOUT relation, ripple paths, magnetics, and EMI constraints.

Pure Boost (Step-Up)

  • When to choose: VOUT > VIN without traversing VIN≈VOUT; cost/size sensitive.
  • Duty & ripple: D ≈ 1 − (VIN·η)/VOUT; size L so ΔIL ≈ 20–40% of IOUT.
  • Rectifier options: diode (simplicity) vs synchronous FET (efficiency, light-load behavior).
  • Reverse conduction: plan SW node clamp/sync-FET off-window to avoid back-feed.
  • EMI path: hot loop around SW → rectifier/FET → COUT → GND; snubber as needed.

Non-Inverting 4-Switch Buck-Boost

  • When to choose: seamless output across VIN<VOUT and VIN>VOUT (e.g., 12↔24 V automotive, variable buses).
  • Control partitioning: consistent loop behavior through buck/boost regions; careful dead-time and transition damping.
  • Trade-offs: more gate drivers, higher drive loss, tighter timing and layout requirements.
  • Note: region transitions shift poles/zeros; limit fc accordingly (details in Control section).

Inverting Buck-Boost (Negative Rail)

  • When to choose: generating a negative rail for analog/audio/op-amp bias.
  • Stress profile: asymmetric switch/inductor currents; plan return path vs system ground.
  • Stability & protection: sense and compensation bandwidth on negative output; align OVP reference.

SEPIC / Ćuk (Brief)

  • When to choose: input traverses and/or input-to-output DC isolation (SEPIC coupling capacitor).
  • Magnetics: two inductors or a coupled inductor; Ćuk can yield low output ripple with different switch stress/EMI profile.
  • Boundary: where efficiency/power density is paramount and your controller supports 4-switch, prefer non-inverting buck-boost; reserve SEPIC/Ćuk for special constraints.

If your constraints point to a fully integrated solution rather than a controller + discrete power stage, see the separate Power Modules page.

Control Methods — The Stability Logic Behind Good Behavior

A boost/buck-boost controller’s stability hinges on the plant (LC, ESR zero, RHPZ) and how you sense/control current. Use this section to decide between voltage-mode vs current-mode, peak vs valley sensing, and to quantify the slope-compensation you must inject.

Voltage-Mode vs Current-Mode

  • Boost (CCM) has an RHPZ: it reduces phase, so crossover fc must be limited; practically keep fc ≤ 1/10 fSW and within about 1/5–1/10 of fRHPZ.
  • Voltage-mode: high design freedom; sensitive to power-stage drift; no inherent slope ramp.
  • Current-mode: effectively single-pole control; compensation is more direct; peak/valley sensing choice matters.

Peak vs Valley Current Sensing

  • Peak: natural OCP integration; sensitive to SW spikes and noise → needs front-end filtering/blanking.
  • Valley: often calmer for light-load/burst modes; more sensitive to timing and minimum on-time constraints.
  • Implementation: Rsense/DCR sensing, CS-amp bandwidth, sample-and-hold timing, blanking window and RC.

Slope Compensation (Suppress Subharmonic Oscillation)

When duty D > 0.5, inject enough ramp such that ms ≥ 0.5·m1, where m1 is the inductor up-slope and ms is the injected slope (as current or CS-voltage). Align the injection path with the sampling timing (COMP-ramp or CS-ramp) to keep loop math consistent.

Slope-compensation condition m_s ≥ 0.5·m1 for current-mode control; align ramp injection with sampling timing.
For D > 0.5, inject a slope ≥ half the inductor up-slope; coordination with sampling timing is essential.

Ready to translate this into zero/pole placement and Bode verification? Continue to Loop Compensation (Type-II/III) in the next section.

First-Pass Power-Stage Sizing — Practical Numbers for Boost/Buck-Boost

Duty (Boost): D ≈ 1 − (VIN · η) / VOUT

Inductor (first estimate): Lmin = (VIN · D) / (ΔIL · fSW) , with ΔIL ≈ 20–40% · IOUT

Boost converter current paths in ON/OFF states, with an inset illustrating inductor ripple ΔIL for first-pass sizing.
Start with ΔIL ≈ 20–40% of IOUT; iterate using thermal/EMI measurements.

Switch Devices

  • Margins: VDS, VRRM, IF with transient headroom.
  • FET trade: RDS(on) ↔ Qg; package θJA; gate-drive peak current.
  • Diode (async): low Qrr/trr to reduce ringing and heat.
  • Sync rectification: efficiency & light-load behavior; manage reverse-conduction window.

Output Capacitors

  • ESR zero: place relative to LC double pole; shape ripple & transient response.
  • Ripple bucket: share ripple between ΔIL and C/ESR; validate at min-VIN/max-IOUT.
  • Derating: MLCC DC-bias & temperature; consider MLCC + bulk mix.

Inductor & Quick Thermals

  • Isat & losses: set ΔIL; check copper vs core at fSW.
  • Shielded cores to tame EMI; consider DCR for current sensing.
  • Fast thermal sanity: θJA budget + copper area; verify hotspots across ambient range.

Capture your first-pass numbers in the worksheet: Power_Stage_Sizing_Worksheet.pdf.

Loop Compensation — Type-II / Type-III for Boost & Buck-Boost

The plant is an LC double pole with an ESR zero; in boost CCM a right-half-plane zero (RHPZ) reduces phase and caps crossover. Design for healthy margins first, then refine with Bode and load-step measurements.

Targets

  • Crossover: fc ≈ fSW/10 (a practical ceiling for most designs).
  • Phase margin: ≥ 50–60° across VIN/IOUT corners and region transitions.
  • Boost CCM note: keep fc below roughly 1/5–1/10 of fRHPZ.

Zero/Pole Placement

  • Type-II: place z1/z2 near the LC double pole; use p1 near the origin to lift low-frequency gain.
  • Type-III: add p2 above fc and use the extra zero/pole to shape steeper plants, e.g., 4-switch buck-boost.
  • Transitions: keep a consistent fc and margin across buck/boost regions; avoid aggressive tuning near VIN≈VOUT.

Verification & Pitfalls

  • Bode: inject at COMP or the loop injection node; verify magnitude & phase across VIN/IOUT corners.
  • Load-step: correlate undershoot/overshoot and damping to phase margin.
  • COMP gotchas: RC tolerances, leakage, and layout parasitics moving intended poles/zeros.
Type-III compensation sketch: z1/z2 near the LC double pole, p1 near origin, and p2 above crossover; keep f_c below the RHPZ constraint in boost CCM.
Practical placement: z1/z2 near the LC double pole, p1 near origin, p2 above fc; remember the RHPZ ceiling in boost CCM.

Need the sensing and slope context? See Control Methods above; for large-signal behavior, continue to Start-Up & Transient.

Start-Up & Transient — Soft-Start, Pre-Bias, Overshoot & Large-Signal Events

This section turns controller features into practical behavior during start-up and large load steps: soft-start/inrush, pre-bias start-up (no discharge), overshoot control in boost, and what valley current limit, minimum on-time, and AAM/PSM do to your transient response and audible/EMI profile.

Soft-Start & Inrush

  • Map the ramp: soft-start slope sets inductor current rise and COUT charge current—your first inrush limiter.
  • Fault windows: ensure OCP/OVP/UVLO thresholds and blanking windows don’t mis-trip during the ramp.
  • Coordination: when upstream inrush control (hot-swap/eFuse) exists, align soft-start timing to avoid contention.

Pre-Bias Start-Up (Do Not Discharge VOUT)

  • Goal: if VOUT is already charged, never force a discharge or negative dip at start-up.
  • Controller actions: early synchronous-FET off window, soft-start reference clamped to the sensed pre-bias, controlled ramp takeover.
  • Common mistake: pulling VOUT down before ramping causes audible clicks and downstream resets.

Overshoot Control in Boost

  • Sources: too-steep soft-start reference, error-amp saturation, min on/off-time limits.
  • Mitigations: gentler soft-start, COMP clamp/bleed path, load-feedforward, output clamp/snubber (RC/TVS) as needed.

Large-Signal Load Steps

  • Valley current limit: dictates recovery time and undershoot on step-up loads; size margin for worst-case.
  • Minimum on-time: with high VIN/light load/high fSW produces ripple plateaus/jitter—consider frequency and slope choices.
  • AAM/PSM trade: quieter light-load modes increase ripple and may slow transients; choose “silence-first” vs “transient-first.”

Protection — Controller Features vs System-Level eFuse/Hot-Swap

Separate controller-level protections (fast, local) from system-level protection (inrush shaping, isolation, and rugged short handling). Use this section to choose modes (hiccup/auto-retry/latch) and to know when to hand off to an eFuse or hot-swap stage.

Controller-Level Protections

  • OCP / ILIM / cycle-by-cycle: peak vs valley limit interactions; slope compensation influences effective threshold.
  • UVLO / OVP / OTP: set windows and hysteresis; prevent false trips during start-up/soft-start.
  • Fault handling: choose hiccup (cool-down safety), auto-retry (availability), or latch (serviceable isolation).

System-Level Protections (eFuse/Hot-Swap)

  • Why: controlled inrush for large C or long cables, robust short-to-VIN/GND handling, downstream fault isolation.
  • Interface: coordinate PG/FAULT logic and power-good delays; align soft-start with upstream dv/dt.
  • Reliability: current-limit slew, short-circuit shutdown, and OTP help reduce upstream supply disturbance.

Hand-Off Criteria

  • Large output capacitance or long leads requiring shaped inrush → use eFuse/hot-swap.
  • Short-to-battery or short-to-ground stress cases → use eFuse with fast limit and thermal cutback.
  • Need fault isolation and diagnostics (current telemetry, event logging) → system-level device.

For controlled inrush and robust short-circuit protection, see our eFuse & Protection ICs page.

EMI & Layout — Start with the Hot Loop

Tame emissions and ringing by optimizing the hot loop, routing sensitive sense lines correctly, and choosing devices that behave well at high dV/dt and dI/dt. Use this section as a practical checklist during layout review.

Hot Loop Minimization

  • Shrink the loop SW → rectifier/synchronous FET → COUT → GND; keep return paths tight and over a solid ground plane.
  • Shield sensitive nodes (FB/CS/COMP) and keep them away from the SW copper and gate-drive traces.
  • Place the snubber close to the SW node; stray inductance weakens damping and shifts ringing frequency.

Sensing & Ground Partition

  • Use Kelvin sensing for CS/ILIM; front-end RC/blanking must remove spikes without erasing useful slope.
  • Partition AGND/PGND and converge at a star point; separate small-signal returns from power currents.
  • Route current-sense and feedback lines away from high dV/dt edges; avoid vias in the critical sense loops.

Device Choices & Ringing

  • Diode reverse recovery (Qrr/trr) shapes ringing; sync FET timing also matters.
  • RC snubber tunes the problematic band; balance damping vs. extra loss by measuring at worst-case corners.
  • Shielded inductors help reduce radiated fields and coupling into sense traces.
Hot loop minimization and snubber placement around the SW node for boost/buck-boost layouts.
Prioritize the hot loop; place snubber close; route small-signal lines far from the SW node.

With the layout discipline in place, close the project loop using the 10-step design flow below.

Design Flow — Ten Steps from Specs to Sign-Off

Use this printable checklist to move from requirements to a validated, production-ready design. Each step links back to decisions covered earlier on this page.

  1. Specs: VIN/VOUT/IOUT, efficiency, ripple, ambient/thermal limits.
  2. Topology & Mode: Boost / non-inverting 4-switch / inverting / SEPIC / Ćuk.
  3. fSW & ΔIL: set frequency and inductor ripple target.
  4. Magnetics: inductor size/material/Isat and loss split.
  5. Switch Devices: FET/diode and gate-drive capability.
  6. Compensation & fc: Type-II/III, crossover and phase margin goal.
  7. Start-Up & Protections: soft-start, pre-bias, OCP/UVLO/OVP/OTP.
  8. EMI & Layout Review: hot loop, ground partition, snubber.
  9. Prototype Build: fixtures, probing plan, measurement points.
  10. Measure → Iterate → Freeze: Bode, large-signal transient, thermal validation.
Ten-step design flow from specs to validation for boost/buck-boost controllers.
Follow the flow, record decisions, and iterate with measured data before freeze.

Download the printable checklist: Boost_Buck-Boost_Design_Flow_Checklist.pdf.

Need the bigger picture? Return to the PMIC Hub for glossary alignment and cross-page navigation.

Controller Selection — Compare by Fields, Not by Part Lists

Use the following decision fields to shortlist a boost/buck-boost controller for your design. Keep overlap with regulator/module pages to a minimum by staying at the parameter level.

VIN Range / VOUT Capability

  • True 4-switch buck-boost for seamless VIN≈VOUT crossover.
  • Boost-only when VOUT ≫ VIN and no crossover is required.
  • Check absolute ratings and operating corners (cold crank, surge).

Gate-Drive Capability

  • Peak source/sink current vs total Qg (including parallel FETs).
  • Driver voltage (VDRV) options and bootstrap/charge-pump details.
  • Single vs dual drivers; dead-time control and shoot-through immunity.

Switching Frequency Options

  • Internal sync range; external clock support; spread spectrum for EMI.
  • Min on-time limits at high VIN/light load; ΔIL vs efficiency.
  • Light-load modes: AAM/PSM and their noise/transient trade-offs.

Compensation Method

  • Internal/fixed for narrow operating ranges and simplicity.
  • External Type-II/III for wide VIN/IOUT and 4-switch transitions.
  • Crossover/phase margin targets across corners (see Loop Compensation).

Current Sensing

  • Low-side / high-side / DCR; amplifier bandwidth and blanking windows.
  • Peak vs valley detection compatibility with your protection scheme.
  • Calibration and temp drift (especially with DCR sensing).

Protections & Soft-Start

  • ILIM strategy, cycle-by-cycle limit, hiccup/auto-retry/latch.
  • UVLO/OVP/OTP ranges; pre-bias start-up behavior.
  • Overshoot control hooks (COMP clamp/bleed, load feedforward).

Package & Thermal

  • θJA targets and copper area guidance; thermal pad layout.
  • Pinout that supports hot loop minimization and clean sense routing.
  • Automotive/industrial ratings if applicable.

Map these fields to your use-case with the application cards below.

Application Cards — Map Decisions to Real Scenarios

Automotive 12 → 24 V

Spec: VIN 9–16 V (crank/surge), VOUT 24 V, IOUT 2–5 A, EMI robustness.

  • Topology: non-inverting 4-switch buck-boost for seamless VIN≈VOUT crossover.
  • Control/Comp: Type-III; keep consistent fc across regions; consider spread spectrum.
  • Protection/EMI: UVLO/OVP/OTP; pair with eFuse for controlled inrush; minimize hot loop.

For layout discipline, see the EMI & Layout section above.

USB-PD 5 → 20 V

Spec: VIN 5–12 V, VOUT 20 V, up to 60–100 W; prioritize efficiency & overshoot control.

  • Topology: synchronous Boost.
  • Control/Comp: current-mode with slope compensation; fc ≤ fSW/10; pre-bias start-up.
  • Protection/EMI: OVP/hiccup; account for cable IR drop; snubber at SW node.

For slope/peaking details, see Control Methods.

Audio Power Amplifier Boost

Spec: VIN ~12 V, VOUT 24–36 V; noise/“pop” suppression and clean transients.

  • Topology: Boost with suitable input filtering.
  • Control/Comp: manage AAM/PSM noise; COMP clamping/bleed to contain overshoot/pop.
  • Protection/EMI: tuned sync-FET timing; shielded inductor; RC/TVS damping.

Tie this back to Start-Up & Transient for pop/overshoot control.

Portable 3.7 → 12 V

Spec: VIN 2.8–4.2 V (cell), VOUT 12 V; tight size/efficiency constraints.

  • Topology: choose between SEPIC (input decoupling) and 4-switch (efficiency/density).
  • Control/Comp: respect minimum on-time at high fSW; Type-III for bandwidth margin.
  • Protection/EMI: pre-bias start-up; MLCC bias derating; thermal budget & light-load efficiency.

Cross-check with Power-Stage Sizing for ΔIL and thermal targets.

FAQs — Quick Answers with Pointers

Why is current-mode often preferred for boost/buck-boost steady-state and transients?
Current-mode turns the plant into an effective single pole, simplifying compensation and improving line transient response. It also naturally limits peak current. For boosts, the RHPZ still caps crossover, but current-mode makes meeting margins easier across corners. See Control Methods.
How do I implement slope compensation when D > 0.5 in real hardware?
Inject a ramp so ms ≥ 0.5·m1, either into the CS pin (voltage ramp) or COMP node (current injection). Align the ramp with sampling; ensure blanking/RC filters don’t erase the useful slope. Avoid excessive ramp that dulls current loop gain. See Control Methods.
How does the boost CCM RHPZ limit fc, and how high can I push it?
The RHPZ reduces phase; pushing crossover near it destabilizes the loop. Practical designs keep fc ≤ fSW/10 and below roughly 1/5–1/10 of fRHPZ. Select compensation to maintain ≥50–60° phase margin across VIN/IOUT corners. See Loop Compensation.
Peak vs valley current sensing — noise and protection trade-offs?
Peak sensing aligns with cycle-by-cycle OCP but is spike-sensitive; use blanking and bandwidth control. Valley sensing is calmer for light-load/burst modes, yet more sensitive to minimum on-time and timing errors. Choose per protection scheme and transient goals. See Control Methods.
How to “quick-size” the RC snubber at the SW node?
Measure the ringing frequency and choose C to place the RC pole near that band; select R ≈ √(Leq/C) for critical damping, then tune by temperature and efficiency impact. Keep the snubber physically close to SW/GND to minimize stray inductance. See EMI & Layout.
How does pre-bias start-up avoid discharge and overshoot?
Sense VOUT first, clamp the soft-start reference to the detected pre-bias, and hold sync-FETs off until takeover. Use a gentle SS slope and COMP clamp/bleed to prevent overshoot. Never pull VOUT down before ramping. See Start-Up & Transient.
Inductor too small vs too large — stability and loss consequences?
Too small: large ΔIL, higher ripple/EMI, slope-comp demand rises, core/copper loss increase. Too large: sluggish dynamics, bigger DCR loss, poorer transient. Start at ΔIL ≈ 20–40% IOUT, then iterate with thermal/EMI data. See Power-Stage Sizing.
Is phase margin harder in 4-switch buck-boost than in pure boost?
Transitions across buck/boost regions shift poles/zeros and device losses, so keeping a consistent fc and phase margin is trickier. Type-III compensation and careful dead-time/timing help. Avoid aggressive tuning near VIN≈VOUT. See Loop Compensation.
How do AAM/PSM light-load modes affect ripple and EMI?
Burst or pulse-skipping reduces switching loss but raises low-frequency ripple and potential audible components. It also changes effective loop dynamics at light load. Select per priority: silence-first vs transient-first, and validate across VIN/temperature. See Control Methods.
How to handle minimum on-time induced output ripple/jitter?
At high VIN/light load/high fSW, min on-time forces duty quantization causing plateaus/jitter. Options: lower fSW, adjust slope/compensation, use light-load modes, or change topology/ratio to ease constraints. Verify with scope and Bode. See Control Methods.
When must I choose SEPIC/Ćuk instead of 4-switch?
Use SEPIC for input-to-output DC isolation or harsh input interruptions; consider Ćuk when ultra-low output ripple is paramount. If efficiency/density dominate and isolation isn’t needed, non-inverting 4-switch is usually better. See Topologies.
Synchronous FET reverse conduction — risks and mitigations?
Reverse conduction can back-feed VOUT/VIN during faults or pre-bias start-up. Mitigate with proper dead-time, reverse-current detect/blanking, sync-off windows during start-up, and clamps where needed. Validate across corners and cable disconnects. See Start-Up & Transient.

Resources & RFQ — Get Help, Fast

Power-Stage Sizing Worksheet (PDF)

Capture first-pass numbers: duty, inductor, device stress, and thermal notes for early prototypes.

Power_Stage_Sizing_Worksheet.pdf