123 Main Street, New York, NY 10001

← Back to: eFuse / Hot-Swap / OR-ing Protection

Standards Map & Threat Linking

Tie each clause to a physical threat, then to a countermeasure site and a measurable acceptance criterion. The goal is not “test tricks” but controlled residuals and energy paths.

IEC 61000-4-2

ESD (contact/air). Watch residual peaks & resets/bit errors.

IEC 61000-4-4

EFT/Burst. Control coupling paths and burst trains.

IEC 61000-4-5

Surge (CM/DM). Layer energy shedding then limit residuals.

ISO 7637-2

Automotive pulses 1/2a/2b/3a/3b/5a on supply rails.

UL/IEC Creepage & Clearance

CTI, pollution degree, altitude; slotting/coating as aids.

Standards → Threats → Countermeasures → Metrics Left: IEC/ISO/UL standards; Middle: ESD/EFT/Surge/ISO threats; Right: TVS, eFuse/Hot-Swap, Ideal-Diode/OR-ing; Bottom: acceptance metrics (residual < rating×X%, ΔV_trip, I_rev, t_sw). Standards IEC 61000-4-2 · ESD IEC 61000-4-4 · EFT IEC 61000-4-5 · Surge (CM/DM) ISO 7637-2 · Automotive Pulses UL/IEC · Creepage & Clearance Threat Types ESD (contact/air) EFT/Burst coupling Surge CM / DM ISO 7637-2 pulses Countermeasure Sites TVS / ESD arrays (near connector; low C, low Rdyn) eFuse / Hot-Swap (ILIM, dv/dt, fast short trip) Ideal-Diode / OR-ing (ΔV_trip, reverse-current) Downstream regulator tolerance Acceptance & Margins Residual ≤ abs. rating × X% (e.g., 80%) · ΔV_trip window = … mV · I_rev(max) = … A · t_sw = … µs · No resets/bit errors Document probe location, bandwidth, sampling, and trigger; keep waveform photos and injection setup photos.

Copy-Ready Notes

  • Declare version/grade/class per standard (e.g., IEC 61000-4-2, Class B/C).
  • For each standard: test points, injection topology, acceptance criteria, regression frequency.
  • Baseline margin: visible ESD residual ≤ device absolute rating × 80%, with no resets/bit errors.
  • Always retain waveform screenshots and probe/setup photos for reproducibility.
Port Standard Level/Grade Topology (CM/DM) Criteria Result Margin % Waveform Probe Photo Owner/Date
USB-C VBUS IEC 61000-4-2 Contact ±8 kV DM Residual ≤ abs×80%, no reset Pass 18% /wf/usb-vbus-esd.png /photo/probe-usb-vbus.jpg AB/2025-11-06

Minimal Regression Set

  1. ESD spot check on the port (contact/air, fixed count per point).
  2. One EFT run with fixed coupling geometry.
  3. One Surge run (CM first; add DM if applicable).
  4. Update residuals/energy window and reset/error status with photos.

Path & Parasitic Threat Models

Show how energy enters, where it transfers or dissipates, and where parasitics spike the peak. Favor the nearest drop-to-GND and the shortest return loop.

Entry & Return Map with Parasitics Two-layer view: top shows connector/shield/TVS and CM path; bottom shows supply/load planes and DM path; callouts mark parasitic L/C, nearest drop-to-ground, via-fence and shortest loop. Connector / Shield TVS (near pad) CM return to chassis/earth Supply / Load Plane L ≈ 1 nH/mm Via-fence Nearest drop-to-GND Peak vs loop length short loop long loop

Copy-Ready Checklist

  • Upload front/back photos of the board and mark primary and alternate return paths.
  • Declare nearest drop-to-GND and any cross-zone vias (⚠).
  • Geometry constraints: TVS_distance_mm ≤ X, Loop_area_cm2 ≤ Y, Via_fence_pitch_mm ≤ Z.
  • Rule of thumb: L ≈ 1 nH/mm; document the added peak risk for long loops.

ESD · Near/Mid/Far

  1. Inject same level at near/mid/far points.
  2. Compare residual peaks and resets/bit errors.
  3. Keep photos of probe and injector positions.

EFT · Coupling Geometry

  1. Fix clamp angle, distance, cable routing.
  2. Repeatability check with photos and parameters.
  3. Record burst train and disturbance window.

Surge · CM → DM

  1. Run CM first for energy shedding.
  2. Add DM to limit residuals.
  3. Track ping-pong vs ΔV_trip window & via-fence.

Device-Stack Synergy (TVS ↔ eFuse/HS ↔ Ideal-Diode)

Engineer synergy, not parts stacking: TVS residual (low Rdyn) feeds into eFuse/Hot-Swap controls (ILIM, short-trip, soft-start dv/dt), finishing with Ideal-Diode/OR-ing (ΔV_trip, I_rev, t_sw) before downstream regulation.

Synergy Waveboard: TVS · eFuse/HS · Ideal-Diode Three side-by-side annotated waveforms comparing: TVS-only residual, TVS + current limit/soft-start, and + Ideal-Diode reverse-current cutoff. ① TVS only ② TVS + eFuse current limit ③ + Ideal-Diode reverse block V_peak Residual set by TVS Rdyn & placement dv/dt ILIM Short-trip → controlled decay ΔV_trip t_sw I_rev(t) Voltage / Residual Current / ILIM Reverse current & cutoff

Copy-Ready Checklist

  • ILIM ≥ peak load × factor, and within downstream SOA.
  • dv/dt sized for inrush cap and allowed ramp; avoid false EFT triggers.
  • ΔV_trip ≈ 10–30 mV (typ.) to prevent ping-pong in source switchover.
  • Quantify I_rev(max) and t_sw; bind values to regression waveforms.

Same-Level Comparison

Inject the same level; record V_peak, ∫V·I·dt, and shut-down timing across the three panels.

Reverse Events

Measure I_rev(t) peak and t_sw; sweep ΔV_trip to check ping-pong risk.

BOM Hook: List ILIM, dv/dt, ΔV_trip, I_rev(max), t_sw, and TVS Vc@I. Any substitution must provide equal-or-better numbers with waveforms; rerun minimal regression.

Layout Rules: The Decalogue

Lock in physically “pass-able” premises with enforceable rules and DRC fields. Show the contrast: bad example → higher residual.

Layout Decalogue with Do/Don’t Thumbnails Ten cards with good vs bad mini-illustrations: nearest TVS, direct return, via-fence, partition & star ground, equal gate drive, Kelvin sense, no cross-zone above loops, ESD return = measurement ground, cap near load, shield-to-chassis tie. Do Don’t TVS ≤ X mm near connector Do Don’t Direct port→TVS→GND return Do Don’t Via-fence moat at ports Do Don’t Power/signal partitions + star GND Do Don’t Equal-length gate drive, low loop Do Don’t Kelvin sense on shunts Do Don’t No cross-zone above critical loops Do Don’t ESD return = measurement ground Do Don’t Bulk caps near the load Do Don’t Shield-to-chassis low-Z tie Residual vs loop/placement good bad
TVS ≤ X mm

Place TVS at the connector pads; minimize series inductance.

Direct return

Route port→TVS→GND directly; avoid sensitive zones.

Via-fence moat

Fence the port region to confine CM currents.

Partition + star GND

Power/signal domains with a defined star junction.

Equal gate drive

Match lengths; minimize loop area to avoid spikes.

Kelvin sensing

Use dedicated sense traces for shunts.

No cross-zone above loops

Keep critical loops clean of cross-layer jumps.

ESD = measurement GND

Share the return reference with probes/fixtures.

Bulk near load

Place bulk caps at the load entry to reduce droop.

Shield-to-chassis

Tie shield to chassis with a low-Z, low-L path.

Field Unit Target Note
TVS_distance_mm mm ≤ X Pad-adjacent if possible
Loop_area_cm2 cm² ≤ Y Bounding-box approximation
Via_fence_pitch_mm mm ≤ Z Confine CM currents
Kelvin_sense_len_mm mm as short as possible Dedicated sense pair
Prohibited_cross_zone flag none No traces above critical loops

Evidence & Archiving

  • Scan via-fence impedance (grid sampling) and estimate loop area; compare residual peaks vs bad example.
  • Photograph key paths, fences, and chassis ties; keep with measurement docs.
BOM Hook: Connector/shell changes require shielding/ground re-validation and ESD/EFT regression. Any part change impacting layout triggers DRC-extended checks + minimal regression.

Creepage & Clearance (CTI · Pollution · Altitude · Slots · Coating)

Parametrize insulation so changes are traceable: environment → material/CTI → minimum creepage/clearance → compensations (slots/coating), with measured evidence and revision control.

Insulation Decision & PCB Cross-Section Left: decision tree from environment and CTI to minimum creepage/clearance and compensations. Right: PCB cross-section with slot width/depth, coating thickness, and actual creepage path. Decision Tree Environment (AC/DC · Auto · Pack) Material & CTI class Pollution degree (PD) Altitude correction Min creepage / clearance Compensation: slots / coating Measure + Safety factor ≥ 1.x PCB Cross-Section Annotation FR-4 substrate Soldermask Slot width depth Conformal coating thickness Actual creepage path Clearance (air) Key Variables CTI_class · PD · Altitude_corr Creepage_min / Clearance_min Slot_width / Slot_depth Coating_thickness Measured_value · Safety_factor ≥ 1.x
Environment / PD / Altitude Material / CTI Creepage_min / Clearance_min Slot / Coating Measured_value Safety_factor ≥ 1.x Owner / Date / Rev
Auto-12V · PD2 · 2000 m FR-4 · CTI 300 2.5 mm / 1.5 mm Slot: 0.8×3.0 · Coating: 30 µm Creepage 3.1 mm / Clearance 1.8 mm 1.24 AB · 2025-11-06 · r1

Verification & Sampling

  • Measure with caliper/microscope; include scale in photos.
  • Link sampling to factory changes (CTI/soldermask/coating/board stack-up).
  • On change: update T3 and rerun insulation review.

BOM Hook

Material/CTI/coating are non-substitutable without T3 update + evidence + change regression.

Test Plans (Probes · Fixtures · Triggers · Criteria · Regression)

Turn compliance into reproducible scripts with a frozen minimal regression set. Fix injection points, probe methods, trigger conditions, and acceptance metrics.

Injection · Probing · Waveforms Left: injection and fixture placement. Middle: correct vs wrong probing. Right: expected vs anomalous waveforms with V_peak, ∫V·I·dt, I_rev and t_sw labels. Injection & Fixture Probing: Correct vs Wrong Expected vs Anomalous ESD gun / EFT clamp / Surge coupling Fixed geometry (angle · distance · routing) Photo evidence: position references Correct Wrong Short ground loop vs long pigtail V_peak ∫V·I·dt t_sw I_rev

Script Skeleton

Injection point → level/grade → count/interval → temperature/supply → records (waveform, photo, status).

Scope & Probes

Bandwidth/attenuation, short ground loop, differential vs single-ended, sampling to avoid aliasing; fixed triggers.

Acceptance Criteria

No reset/bit errors/abnormal PG-FAULT; bound V_peak, energy window ∫V·I·dt, I_rev peak and t_sw.

Minimal Regression: Run ESD spot-check + one EFT + one Surge at fixed locations with photos whenever parts/layout change.
Phase Check Item Owner Status
Design Port map & injection points frozen AB Open
Layout Probe points & photos defined CD Open
Validation Baseline waveform library captured EF Open
TVS (Vc, Rdyn, C) eFuse/HS (ILIM, dv/dt) Ideal-Diode (ΔV_trip, I_rev, t_sw) Bound to Waveform
Vc@I = 13.5 V · Rdyn = 0.3 Ω · C = 0.25 pF ILIM = 3.0 A · dv/dt = 0.5 V/ms ΔV_trip = 20 mV · I_rev = 1.2 A · t_sw = 8 µs /wfm/portA_surge_lvl2_2025-11-06_r1.png

Baseline Waveform Library

Naming: <port>_<std>_<level>_<date>_<rev>.wfm/png. Track scope bandwidth/attenuation/sampling and trigger conditions.

BOM Hook

Substitution is valid only with equal or better trio: V_peak residual, shut-down timing (t_sw), I_rev peak, plus minimal regression rerun.

Request a Quote

Accepted Formats

pdf, csv, xls, xlsx, zip

Attachment

Drag & drop files here or use the button below.

BOM Notes & Small-Batch Substitution Red Lines

Copy-ready BOM Text (paste verbatim)

  • Port TVS/ESD array must be pad-adjacent to the connector; trace ≤ X mm with a direct return to ground. Specify Vc@I, Rdyn, and port capacitance.
  • eFuse/Hot-Swap must expose configurable ILIM/dv/dt and clear PG/FAULT semantics; document short-circuit mode and minimum SOA limits.
  • Ideal-Diode/OR-ing must provide I_rev limiting and a defined ΔV_trip window (anti ping-pong). Record t_sw.
  • Before substituting any device: update the Cloud Telemetry Mapper, then run the minimal regression set (ESD spot-check + one EFT + one Surge) and archive waveforms.
  • Creepage/clearance shall be verified against CTI, Pollution Degree, and altitude. Complete the T3 record (measured values + photos) prior to release.
ESD ≠ Surge

Passing IEC 61000-4-2 does not imply passing 61000-4-5. Any substitution must include at least one Surge regression at the same injection topology and level.

TVS metrics that matter

Do not qualify by Vbr alone. Specify and compare Vc@I and Rdyn; for high-speed ports include differential capacitance constraints.

eFuse/HS re-tuning

Changing eFuse/Hot-Swap PNs requires re-setting ILIM and dv/dt, plus verification against downstream SOA and short-trip timing.

Mechanical/material changes

Any change to package, laminate, soldermask, or coating mandates re-computing creepage/clearance and re-running the minimal regression set.

OR-ing stability

Adjustments affecting source impedance require revisiting ΔV_trip and I_rev to avoid ping-pong switching during switchover.

Submission Item Format Acceptance
Triptych waveforms (injection/probing/expected vs anomalous) PNG + scope metadata Same topology & level as baseline
T2 device-stack parameter mapping Table (TVS↔eFuse↔Ideal-Diode) Values bound to waveform IDs
T3 creepage/clearance record Measured table + photos Safety factor ≥ 1.x
Compliance matrix (Std×Port×Grade×Result×Margin) CSV or table Pass + margin ≥ target
Probe/fixture photos with scale JPEG/PNG Clearly shows geometry references

Acceptance & Metrics

  • V_peak residual ≤ predefined fraction of absolute ratings (e.g., ≤ 80%).
  • Energy window ∫V·I·dt not worse than baseline; document integration window.
  • I_rev(peak) and t_sw not increased; verify ping-pong absence at source switchover.
  • ILIM, dv/dt, ΔV_trip values are bound to waveform evidence and revision IDs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can a port pass IEC 61000-4-2 yet fail 61000-4-5?

ESD is a charge event dominated by peak current and very short duration, while Surge carries far more energy and often couples through cabling and grounds. A design tuned only for low residual via a TVS may still overheat or overstress power devices during Surge. Validate both residual and energy window.

How close must the ESD array be to truly reduce residual?

Place the ESD array pad-adjacent to the connector, keeping the loop length within a few millimeters. Parasitic inductance is roughly ~1 nH per millimeter, which directly adds overshoot at fast edges. Short, direct return to ground is as important as proximity; avoid meandering or crossing sensitive zones.

Should the common-mode choke sit before or after the TVS on data ports?

For most high-speed links, place the TVS closest to the connector pads to shunt fast transients with minimal inductance, then the CM choke. Upstream chokes may create additional residual if the path to ground is long. Balance SI needs with protection by selecting low-capacitance arrays and verified layouts.

How do I set eFuse ILIM/dv/dt to avoid EFT false trips?

Start with ILIM at peak load times a safety factor and ensure downstream SOA. Set dv/dt from permissible inrush and rail capacitance, then verify against EFT burst trains. If nuisance trips occur, slightly increase dv/dt, confirm short-trip thresholds, and verify that PG/FAULT semantics remain deterministic under bursts.

What ΔV_trip prevents ping-pong in OR-ing?

A practical starting window is 10–30 mV, tuned to source impedance, harness resistance, and thermal drift. Too small causes chatter under small disturbances; too large wastes headroom. Sweep with real wiring and measure reverse current and switchover time to confirm stable, single-edge transitions.

Which ISO 7637-2 pulses stress Ideal-Diode reverse blocking most?

Pulses with steep edges and negative excursions—such as Pulse 1 and 3a—challenge reverse blocking. Also consider load dump variants where supply rises quickly. Characterize I_rev peak and t_sw under each case, ensuring thermal limits are not exceeded and no chatter occurs during recovery.

When do I need two-stage clamping or GDT + TVS cascades?

Use two-stage clamping for long cables, outdoor runs, or high-energy surge paths. A GDT diverts bulk energy and common-mode stress; a fast TVS limits residual on sensitive rails. Provide spacing, creepage, and follow-on insulation clearances appropriate to the GDT’s holdover and follow current behavior.

How do I verify return paths are short—where to probe and what to watch?

Probe at the port pad, the TVS ground pad, and the nearest ground stitching. Use the same reference as measurement ground. Compare V_peak and ringing while injecting near, mid, and far points. Larger loop areas increase overshoot and residual; photos with rulers document geometry for regression.

How should I define engineering margin beyond a simple Pass?

Set a margin target (e.g., 10–20%) on residual and energy windows, considering aging, temperature rise, cable variability, and material drift. Document exact setups and probe conditions so future regressions compare apples to apples rather than nominal Pass at a single fixture configuration.

How do I document creepage/clearance to avoid factory material-change risks?

Record CTI class, Pollution Degree, altitude correction, and minimum creepage/clearance. Fill the T3 table with measured values and photos including a scale. Link T3 to the change-control process so laminate, soldermask, or coating substitutions automatically trigger an insulation review and minimal regression.

Which substitutions can safely skip a full compliance matrix in small batches?

You may skip the full matrix only when parameter parity is proven: equal-or-better V_peak residual, t_sw, and I_rev at the same injection points, plus unchanged layout geometry and T3 insulation factors. Even then, run the minimal regression set and attach side-by-side waveform evidence.

How do oscilloscope/probe choices avoid aliasing or under-reading residuals?

Use sufficient bandwidth, appropriate attenuation, and short ground loops; prefer differential probes for floating measurements. Keep sampling high enough to capture rise times without aliasing. Fix trigger modes and levels across runs so comparisons reflect the circuit, not changing measurement conditions.